Superoxide Dismutase Variants and Methods of Use Thereof

ABSTRACT

The present disclosure provides variant superoxide dismutase polypeptides, compositions comprising the polypeptides, and nucleic acids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding the polypeptides. The present disclosure provides methods of reducing oxidative damage in a cell, tissue, or organ. The present disclosure provides methods of identifying agents that increase superoxide dismutase activity.

BACKGROUND

Superoxide radicals and other highly reactive oxygen species are harmfulby-products produced in every respiring cell, causing oxidative damageto a wide variety of macromolecules and cellular components.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present disclosure provides variant superoxide dismutasepolypeptides, compositions comprising the polypeptides, and nucleicacids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding the polypeptides. Thepresent disclosure provides methods of reducing oxidative stress and/ordamage in a cell, tissue, or organ. The present disclosure providesmethods of identifying agents that increase superoxide dismutaseactivity.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIGS. 1A-E depict the requirement for SIRT3 in reduction of oxidativestress and damage by calorie restriction.

FIGS. 2A-E depict the role of SIRT3 in calorie restriction-inducedmetabolic switch to fatty acid oxidation.

FIGS. 3A-K depict SIRT3-mediated reduction of cellular ROS levels bydeacetylation and activation of SOD2.

FIGS. 4A-C depict SIRT3 dependence of activation of SOD2 during calorierestriction.

FIG. 5 provides an alignment of amino acid sequences of SOD2 of variousspecies.

FIGS. 6A and 6B provide amino acid sequences of exemplary SOD2 variants.

FIG. 7 provides an amino acid sequence of a human SIRT3 polypeptide.

FIG. 8 provides a nucleotide sequence encoding the human SIRT3polypeptide depicted in FIG. 7.

DEFINITIONS

The terms “polypeptide,” “peptide,” and “protein,” used interchangeablyherein, refer to a polymeric form of amino acids of any length, whichcan include coded and non-coded amino acids, chemically or biochemicallymodified or derivatized amino acids, and polypeptides having modifiedpeptide backbones. The term includes fusion proteins, including, but notlimited to, fusion proteins with a heterologous amino acid sequence,fusions with heterologous and homologous leader sequences, with orwithout N-terminal methionine residues; immunologically tagged proteins;and the like. NH₂ refers to the free amino group present at the aminoterminus of a polypeptide. COOH refers to the free carboxyl grouppresent at the carboxyl terminus of a polypeptide. In keeping withstandard polypeptide nomenclature, J. Biol. Chem., 243 (1969), 3552-59is used.

The terms “polynucleotide” and “nucleic acid,” used interchangeablyherein, refer to a polymeric form of nucleotides of any length, eitherribonucleotides or deoxynucleotides. Thus, this term includes, but isnot limited to, single-, double-, or multi-stranded DNA or RNA, genomicDNA, cDNA, DNA-RNA hybrids, or a polymer comprising purine andpyrimidine bases or other natural, chemically or biochemically modified,non-natural, or derivatized nucleotide bases.

The nucleic acid may be double stranded, single stranded, or containportions of both double stranded or single stranded sequence. As will beappreciated by those in the art, the depiction of a single strand(“Watson”) also defines the sequence of the other strand (“Crick”). Bythe term “recombinant nucleic acid” herein is meant nucleic acid,originally formed in vitro, in general, by the manipulation of nucleicacid by endonucleases, in a form not normally found in nature. Thus anisolated nucleic acid, in a linear form, or an expression vector formedin vitro by ligating DNA molecules that are not normally joined, areboth considered recombinant for the purposes of this invention. It isunderstood that once a recombinant nucleic acid is made and reintroducedinto a host cell or organism, it will replicate non-recombinantly, i.e.using the in vivo cellular machinery of the host cell rather than invitro manipulations; however, such nucleic acids, once producedrecombinantly, although subsequently replicated non-recombinantly, arestill considered recombinant for the purposes of the invention.

Nucleic acid sequence identity (as well as amino acid sequence identity)is calculated based on a reference sequence, which may be a subset of alarger sequence, such as a conserved motif, coding region, flankingregion, etc. A reference sequence will usually be at least about 18residues long, more usually at least about 30 residues long, and mayextend to the complete sequence that is being compared. Algorithms forsequence analysis are known in the art, such as BLAST, described inAltschul et al. (1990), J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-10 (using defaultsettings, i.e. parameters w=4 and T=17).

The term “genetic modification” and refers to a permanent or transientgenetic change induced in a cell following introduction into the cell ofnew nucleic acid (i.e., nucleic acid exogenous to the cell). Geneticchange (“modification”) can be accomplished by incorporation of the newnucleic acid into the genome of the host cell, or by transient or stablemaintenance of the new nucleic acid as an extrachromosomal element.Where the cell is a eukaryotic cell, a permanent genetic change can beachieved by introduction of the nucleic acid into the genome of thecell. Suitable methods of genetic modification include viral infection,transfection, conjugation, protoplast fusion, electroporation, particlegun technology, calcium phosphate precipitation, direct microinjection,and the like.

As used herein the term “isolated” is meant to describe apolynucleotide, a polypeptide, or a cell that is in an environmentdifferent from that in which the polynucleotide, the polypeptide, or thecell naturally occurs. An isolated genetically modified host cell may bepresent in a mixed population of genetically modified host cells. Anisolated polypeptide will in some embodiments be synthetic. “Syntheticpolypeptides” are assembled from amino acids, and are chemicallysynthesized in vitro, e.g., cell-free chemical synthesis, usingprocedures known to those skilled in the art.

By “purified” is meant a compound of interest (e.g., a polypeptide) hasbeen separated from components that accompany it in nature. “Purified”can also be used to refer to a compound of interest separated fromcomponents that can accompany it during manufacture (e.g., in chemicalsynthesis). In some embodiments, a compound is substantially pure whenit is at least 50% to 60%, by weight, free from organic molecules withwhich it is naturally associated or with which it is associated duringmanufacture. In some embodiments, the preparation is at least 75%, atleast 90%, at least 95%, or at least 99%, by weight, of the compound ofinterest. A substantially pure polypeptide can be obtained, for example,by chemically synthesizing the polypeptide, or by a combination ofpurification and chemical modification. A substantially pure polypeptidecan also be obtained by, for example, affinity chromatography. Puritycan be measured by any appropriate method, e.g., chromatography, massspectroscopy, high performance liquid chromatography analysis, etc.

The terms “individual,” “subject,” “host,” and “patient,” usedinterchangeably herein, refer to a mammal, including, but not limitedto, murines (rats, mice), non-human primates, humans, canines, felines,ungulates (e.g., equines, bovines, ovines, porcines, caprines), etc. Insome embodiments, the individual is a human. In some embodiments, theindividual is a murine.

The terms “treatment,” “treating,” “treat,” and the like are used hereinto generally refer to obtaining a desired pharmacologic and/orphysiologic effect. The effect may be prophylactic in terms ofcompletely or partially preventing a disease or symptom thereof and/ormay be therapeutic in terms of a partial or complete stabilization orcure for a disease and/or adverse effect attributable to the disease.“Treatment” as used herein covers any treatment of a disease in amammal, particularly a human, and includes: (a) preventing the diseaseor symptom from occurring in a subject which may be predisposed to thedisease or symptom but has not yet been diagnosed as having it; (b)inhibiting the disease symptom, i.e., arresting its development; or (c)relieving the disease symptom, i.e., causing regression of the diseaseor symptom.

A “therapeutically effective amount” or “efficacious amount” means theamount of an agent that, when administered to a mammal or other subjectfor treating a disease, is sufficient to effect such treatment for thedisease. The “therapeutically effective amount” will vary depending onagent, the disease or condition and its severity and the age, weight,etc., of the subject to be treated.

Before the present invention is further described, it is to beunderstood that this invention is not limited to particular embodimentsdescribed, as such may, of course, vary. It is also to be understoodthat the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describingparticular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting, sincethe scope of the present invention will be limited only by the appendedclaims.

Where a range of values is provided, it is understood that eachintervening value, to the tenth of the unit of the lower limit unlessthe context clearly dictates otherwise, between the upper and lowerlimit of that range and any other stated or intervening value in thatstated range, is encompassed within the invention. The upper and lowerlimits of these smaller ranges may independently be included in thesmaller ranges, and are also encompassed within the invention, subjectto any specifically excluded limit in the stated range. Where the statedrange includes one or both of the limits, ranges excluding either orboth of those included limits are also included in the invention.

Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used hereinhave the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill inthe art to which this invention belongs. Although any methods andmaterials similar or equivalent to those described herein can also beused in the practice or testing of the present invention, the preferredmethods and materials are now described. All publications mentionedherein are incorporated herein by reference to disclose and describe themethods and/or materials in connection with which the publications arecited.

It must be noted that as used herein and in the appended claims, thesingular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless thecontext clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “asuperoxide dismutase variant polypeptide” includes a plurality of suchpolypeptides and reference to “the formulation” includes reference toone or more formulations and equivalents thereof known to those skilledin the art, and so forth. It is further noted that the claims may bedrafted to exclude any optional element. As such, this statement isintended to serve as antecedent basis for use of such exclusiveterminology as “solely,” “only” and the like in connection with therecitation of claim elements, or use of a “negative” limitation.

The publications discussed herein are provided solely for theirdisclosure prior to the filing date of the present application. Nothingherein is to be construed as an admission that the present invention isnot entitled to antedate such publication by virtue of prior invention.Further, the dates of publication provided may be different from theactual publication dates which may need to be independently confirmed.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present disclosure provides variant superoxide dismutasepolypeptides, compositions comprising the polypeptides, and nucleicacids comprising nucleotide sequences encoding the polypeptides. Thepresent disclosure provides methods of reducing oxidative stress and/ordamage in a cell, tissue, or organ.

Variant Superoxide Dismutase Polypeptides

The present disclosure provides variant superoxide dismutasepolypeptides, and compositions comprising the polypeptides.

A subject variant SOD2 polypeptide exhibits enzymatic activity that isat least about 25%, at least about 50%, at least about 75%, at leastabout 2-fold, at least about 2.5-fold, at least about 3-fold, at leastabout 4-fold, at least about 5-fold, at least about 6-fold, at leastabout 7-fold, at least about 8-fold, at least about 9-fold, or at leastabout 10-fold, or more than 10-fold, higher than the enzymatic activityof a SOD2 polypeptide comprising the amino acid sequence set forth inSEQ ID NO:1 (Homo sapiens SOD2 amino acid sequence as depicted in FIG.5).

Enzymatic activity of a subject variant SOD2 polypeptide can bedetermined using any known method, where a suitable method includes thatdescribed in Schisler and Singh (1985) Biochem. Genet. 23:291.

A subject variant SOD2 polypeptide comprises amino acid substitutions ofat least K53 and K89, compared to the amino acid sequence set forth inSEQ ID NO:1. Thus, e.g., a subject variant SOD2 polypeptide can comprisean amino acid sequence having at least about 85%, at least about 90%, atleast about 95%, at least about 98%, up to about 99%, amino acidsequence identity to the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:1,where the variant SOD2 polypeptide comprises amino acid substitutions atK53 and K89 compared with the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ IDNO:1.

Amino acid sequences of exemplary SOD2 variants are depicted in FIGS. 6Aand 6B. In some embodiments, a subject variant SOD2 polypeptidecomprises an amino acid sequence having at least about 85%, at leastabout 90%, at least about 95%, at least about 98%, at least about 99%,or 100%, amino acid sequence identity to an amino acid sequence depictedin FIGS. 6A and 6B and set forth in SEQ ID NOs:8-15, where amino acids53 and 89 are not lysine.

In some embodiments, a subject variant SOD2 polypeptide comprises one ormore modifications such as: 1) a poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) moiety; 2)a saccharide moiety; 3) a carbohydrate moiety; 4) a myristyl group; 5) alipid moiety; and the like.

In some embodiments, a subject variant SOD2 polypeptide comprises aprotein transduction domain. “Protein Transduction Domain” or PTD refersto a polypeptide, polynucleotide, carbohydrate, or organic or inorganiccompound that facilitates traversing a lipid bilayer, micelle, cellmembrane, organelle membrane, or vesicle membrane. A PTD attached toanother molecule facilitates the molecule traversing a membrane, forexample going from extracellular space to intracellular space, orcytosol to within an organelle. In some embodiments, a PTD is covalentlylinked to the amino terminus of a subject variant SOD2 polypeptide. Insome embodiments, a PTD is covalently linked to the carboxyl terminus ofa subject variant SOD2 polypeptide.

Exemplary protein transduction domains include but are not limited to aminimal undecapeptide protein transduction domain (corresponding toresidues 47-57 of HIV-1 TAT comprising YGRKKRRQRRR; SEQ ID NO:16); apolyarginine sequence comprising a number of arginines sufficient todirect entry into a cell (e.g., 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, or 10-50arginines); a VP22 domain (Zender et al., Cancer Gene Ther. 2002 June;9(6):489-96); an Drosophila Antennapedia protein transduction domain(Noguchi et al., Diabetes 2003; 52(7):1732-1737); a truncated humancalcitonin peptide (Trehin et al. Pharm. Research, 21:1248-1256, 2004);polylysine (Wender et al., PNAS, Vol. 97:13003-13008); RRQRRTSKLMKR (SEQID NO:17); Transportan GWTLNSAGYLLGKINLKALAALAKKIL (SEQ ID NO:18);KALAWEAKLAKALAKALAKHLAKALAKALKCEA (SEQ ID NO:19); and RQIKIWFQNRRMKWKK(SEQ ID NO:20). Exemplary PTDs include but are not limited to,YGRKKRRQRRR (SEQ ID NO:16), RKKRRQRRR (SEQ ID NO:21); an argininehomopolymer of from 3 arginine residues to 50 arginine residues.Exemplary PTD domain amino acid sequences include, but are not limitedto: YARAAARQARA (SEQ ID NO:22); THRLPRRRRRR (SEQ ID NO:23); andGGRRARRRRRR (SEQ ID NO:24).

In some embodiments, a subject SOD2 variant polypeptide comprises apeptide that facilitates entry into a mitochondrion. See, e.g., U.S.Pat. No. 7,470,661. In some embodiments, a subject SOD2 variantpolypeptide comprises a peptide that facilitates entry into a neuronalcell (e.g., a neuron). See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 7,470,661. In someembodiments, a subject SOD2 variant polypeptide comprises a peptide thatfacilitates entry into a mitochondrion, and a peptide that facilitatesentry into a neuronal cell. In some embodiments, the peptide thatfacilitates entry into a mitochondrion and/or the peptide thatfacilitates entry into a neuronal cell is linked to the variant SOD2polypeptide by a protease-cleavable linker.

A subject SOD2 variant polypeptide will in some embodiments be linked to(e.g., covalently or non-covalently linked) a fusion partner, e.g., aligand; an epitope tag; a peptide; a protein other than a subject SOD2variant polypeptide; and the like. Suitable fusion partners includepeptides and polypeptides that confer enhanced stability in vivo (e.g.,enhanced serum half-life); provide ease of purification, e.g.,(His)_(n), e.g., 6His, and the like; provide for secretion of the fusionprotein from a cell; provide an epitope tag, e.g., GST, hemagglutinin(HA; e.g., CYPYDVPDYA; SEQ ID NO:25), FLAG (e.g., DYKDDDDK; SEQ IDNO:26), c-myc (e.g., CEQKLISEEDL; SEQ ID NO:27), and the like; provide adetectable signal, e.g., an enzyme that generates a detectable product(e.g., β-galactosidase, luciferase), or a protein that is itselfdetectable, e.g., a green fluorescent protein, a red fluorescentprotein, a yellow fluorescent protein, etc.; provides formultimerization, e.g., a multimerization domain such as an Fc portion ofan immunoglobulin; and the like.

A subject variant SOD2 polypeptide can be made using any of a variety ofestablished methods, e.g., conventional synthetic methods for proteinsynthesis; recombinant DNA methods; etc.

The present disclosure provides a composition comprising a subjectvariant SOD2 polypeptide. A subject variant SOD2 polypeptide compositioncan comprise, in addition to a subject variant SOD2 polypeptide, one ormore of: a salt, e.g., NaCl, MgCl₂, KCl, MgSO₄, etc.; a buffering agent,e.g., a Tris buffer, N-(2-Hydroxyethyl)piperazine-N′-(2-ethanesulfonicacid) (HEPES),2-(N-Morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid(MES),2-(N-Morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid sodium salt(MES),3-(N-Morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (MOPS),N-tris[Hydroxymethyl]methyl-3-aminopropanesulfonic acid (TAPS), etc.; asolubilizing agent; a detergent, e.g., a non-ionic detergent such asTween-20, etc.; a protease inhibitor; glycerol; and the like.

Nucleic Acids

The present disclosure provides a nucleic acid comprising a nucleotidesequence encoding a subject variant SOD2 polypeptide.

In some embodiments, a subject nucleic acid is an expression vectorthat, when introduced into a host cell, provides for production of asubject variant SOD2 polypeptide.

A nucleotide sequence encoding a subject variant SOD2 polypeptide can beoperably linked to one or more regulatory elements, such as a promoterand enhancer, that allow expression of the nucleotide sequence in theintended target cells (e.g., a cell that is genetically modified tosynthesize the encoded variant SOD2 polypeptide).

Suitable promoter and enhancer elements are known in the art. Forexpression in a bacterial cell, suitable promoters include, but are notlimited to, lacI, lacZ, T3, T7, gpt, lambda P and trc. For expression ina eukaryotic cell, suitable promoters include, but are not limited to,light and/or heavy chain immunoglobulin gene promoter and enhancerelements; cytomegalovirus immediate early promoter; herpes simplex virusthymidine kinase promoter; early and late SV40 promoters; promoterpresent in long terminal repeats from a retrovirus; mousemetallothionein-I promoter; and various art-known tissue specificpromoters.

Large numbers of suitable vectors and promoters are known to those ofskill in the art; many are commercially available for generating asubject recombinant construct. The following vectors are provided by wayof example. Bacterial: pBs, phagescript, PsiX174, pBluescript SK, pBsKS, pNH8a, pNH16a, pNH18a, pNH46a (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif., USA);pTrc99A, pKK223-3, pKK233-3, pDR540, and pRIT5 (Pharmacia, Uppsala,Sweden). Eukaryotic: pWLneo, pSV2cat, pOG44, PXR1, pSG (Stratagene)pSVK3, pBPV, pMSG and pSVL (Pharmacia).

Expression vectors generally have convenient restriction sites locatednear the promoter sequence to provide for the insertion of nucleic acidsequences encoding a protein of interest. Suitable marker operative inthe expression host may be present. Suitable expression vectors include,but are not limited to, viral vectors (e.g. viral vectors based onvaccinia virus; poliovirus; adenovirus (see, e.g., Li et al., InvestOpthalmol V is Sci 35:2543 2549, 1994; Borras et al., Gene Ther 6:515524, 1999; Li and Davidson, PNAS 92:7700 7704, 1995; Sakamoto et al., HGene Ther 5:1088 1097, 1999; WO 94/12649, WO 93/03769; WO 93/19191; WO94/28938; WO 95/11984 and WO 95/00655); adeno-associated virus (see,e.g., Ali et al., Hum Gene Ther 9:8186, 1998, Flannery et al., PNAS94:6916 6921, 1997; Bennett et al., Invest Opthalmol V is Sci 38:28572863, 1997; Jomary et al., Gene Ther 4:683 690, 1997, Rolling et al.,Hum Gene Ther 10:641 648, 1999; Ali et al., Hum Mol Genet. 5:591 594,1996; Srivastava in WO 93/09239, Samulski et al., J. Vir. (1989)63:3822-3828; Mendelson et al., Virol. (1988) 166:154-165; and Flotte etal., PNAS (1993) 90:10613-10617); SV40; herpes simplex virus; humanimmunodeficiency virus (see, e.g., Miyoshi et al., PNAS 94:10319 23,1997; Takahashi et al., J Virol 73:7812 7816, 1999); a retroviral vector(e.g., Murine Leukemia Virus, spleen necrosis virus, and vectors derivedfrom retroviruses such as Rous Sarcoma Virus, Harvey Sarcoma Virus,avian leukosis virus, human immunodeficiency virus, myeloproliferativesarcoma virus, and mammary tumor virus); and the like.

Cells

The present disclosure provides isolated genetically modified host cells(e.g., in vitro cells) that are genetically modified with a subjectnucleic acid. In some embodiments, a subject isolated geneticallymodified host cell can produce a subject variant SOD2 polypeptide.

Suitable host cells include eukaryotic host cells, such as a mammaliancell, an insect host cell, a yeast cell; and prokaryotic cells, such asa bacterial cell. Introduction of a subject nucleic acid into the hostcell can be effected, for example by calcium phosphate precipitation,DEAE dextran mediated transfection, liposome-mediated transfection,electroporation, or other known method.

Suitable mammalian cells include primary cells and immortalized celllines. Suitable mammalian cell lines include human cell lines, non-humanprimate cell lines, rodent (e.g., mouse, rat) cell lines, and the like.Suitable mammalian cell lines include, but are not limited to, HeLacells (e.g., American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) No. CCL-2), CHOcells (e.g., ATCC Nos. CRL9618, CCL61, CRL9096), 293 cells (e.g., ATCCNo. CRL-1573), Vero cells, NIH 3T3 cells (e.g., ATCC No. CRL-1658),Huh-7 cells, BHK cells (e.g., ATCC No. CCL10), PC12 cells (ATCC No.CRL1721), COS cells, COS-7 cells (ATCC No. CRL1651), RAT1 cells, mouse Lcells (ATCC No. CCLI.3), human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells (ATCC No.CRL1573), HLHepG2 cells, and the like.

Suitable yeast cells include, but are not limited to, Pichia pastoris,Pichia finlandica, Pichia trehalophila, Pichia koclamae, Pichiamembranaefaciens, Pichia opuntiae, Pichia thermotolerans, Pichiasalictaria, Pichia guercuum, Pichia pijperi, Pichia stiptis, Pichiamethanolica, Pichia sp., Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces sp.,Hansenula polymorpha, Kluyveromyces sp., Kluyveromyces lactis, Candidaalbicans, Aspergillus nidulans, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus oryzae,Trichoderma reesei, Chrysosporium lucknowense, Fusarium sp., Fusariumgramineum, Fusarium venenatum, Neurospora crassa, Chlamydomonasreinhardtii, and the like.

Suitable prokaryotic cells include, but are not limited to, any of avariety of laboratory strains of Escherichia coli, Lactobacillus sp.,Salmonella sp., Shigella sp., and the like. See, e.g., Carrier et al.(1992) J. Immunol. 148:1176-1181; U.S. Pat. No. 6,447,784; and Sizemoreet al. (1995) Science 270:299-302. Examples of Salmonella strains whichcan be employed in the present invention include, but are not limitedto, Salmonella typhi and S. typhimurium. Suitable Shigella strainsinclude, but are not limited to, Shigella flexneri, Shigella sonnei, andShigella disenteriae. Typically, the laboratory strain is one that isnon-pathogenic. Non-limiting examples of other suitable bacteriainclude, but are not limited to, Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas pudita,Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomonas mevalonii, Rhodobacter sphaeroides,Rhodobacter capsulatus, Rhodospirillum rubrum, Rhodococcus sp., and thelike. In some embodiments, the host cell is Escherichia coli.

Compositions

The present disclosure provides compositions comprising a subjectvariant SOD2 polypeptide. In some embodiments, a subject compositioncomprises a subject variant SOD2 polypeptide and a pharmaceuticallyacceptable carrier. In some embodiments, a subject composition comprisesa subject variant SOD2 polypeptide and at least one food-gradecomponent.

A subject variant SOD2 polypeptide can be administered to a host usingany convenient means capable of resulting in the desired therapeuticeffect. Thus, a subject variant SOD2 polypeptide can be incorporatedinto a variety of formulations for therapeutic administration. Moreparticularly, a subject variant SOD2 polypeptide can be formulated intopharmaceutical compositions by combination with appropriate,pharmaceutically acceptable carriers or diluents, and may be formulatedinto preparations in solid, semi-solid, liquid or gaseous forms, such astablets, capsules, powders, granules, ointments, solutions,suppositories, and injections.

In pharmaceutical dosage forms, a subject variant SOD2 polypeptide canbe formulated alone or in appropriate association, as well as incombination, with other pharmaceutically active compounds. The followingmethods and excipients are merely exemplary and are in no way limiting.

For oral preparations, a subject variant SOD2 polypeptide can be usedalone or in combination with appropriate additives to make tablets,powders, granules or capsules, for example, with conventional additives,such as lactose, mannitol, corn starch or potato starch; with binders,such as crystalline cellulose, cellulose derivatives, acacia, cornstarch or gelatins; with disintegrators, such as corn starch, potatostarch or sodium carboxymethylcellulose; with lubricants, such as talcor magnesium stearate; and if desired, with diluents, buffering agents,moistening agents, preservatives and flavoring agents.

A subject variant SOD2 polypeptide can be formulated into preparationsfor injection by dissolving, suspending or emulsifying them in anaqueous or nonaqueous solvent, such as vegetable or other similar oils,synthetic aliphatic acid glycerides, esters of higher aliphatic acids orpropylene glycol; and if desired, with conventional additives such assolubilizers, isotonic agents, suspending agents, emulsifying agents,stabilizers and preservatives.

Pharmaceutical compositions comprising a subject variant SOD2polypeptide are prepared by mixing the polypeptide having the desireddegree of purity with optional physiologically acceptable carriers,excipients, stabilizers, surfactants, buffers and/or tonicity agents.Acceptable carriers, excipients and/or stabilizers are nontoxic torecipients at the dosages and concentrations employed, and includebuffers such as phosphate, citrate, and other organic acids;antioxidants including ascorbic acid, glutathione, cysteine, methionineand citric acid; preservatives (such as ethanol, benzyl alcohol, phenol,m-cresol, p-chlor-m-cresol, methyl or propyl parabens, benzalkoniumchloride, or combinations thereof); amino acids such as arginine,glycine, ornithine, lysine, histidine, glutamic acid, aspartic acid,isoleucine, leucine, alanine, phenylalanine, tyrosine, tryptophan,methionine, serine, proline and combinations thereof; monosaccharides,disaccharides and other carbohydrates; low molecular weight (less thanabout 10 residues) polypeptides; proteins, such as gelatin or serumalbumin; chelating agents such as EDTA; sugars such as trehalose,sucrose, lactose, glucose, mannose, maltose, galactose, fructose,sorbose, raffinose, glucosamine, N-Methylglucosamine, galactosamine, andneuraminic acid; and/or non-ionic surfactants such as Tween, BrijPluronics, Triton-X or polyethylene glycol (PEG).

The pharmaceutical composition may be in a liquid form, a lyophilizedform or a liquid form reconstituted from a lyophilized form, wherein thelyophilized preparation is to be reconstituted with a sterile solutionprior to administration. The standard procedure for reconstituting alyophilized composition is to add back a volume of pure water (typicallyequivalent to the volume removed during lyophilization); howeversolutions comprising antibacterial agents may be used for the productionof pharmaceutical compositions for parenteral administration; see alsoChen (1992) Drug Dev Ind Pharm 18, 1311-54.

Exemplary variant SOD2 polypeptide concentrations in a subjectpharmaceutical composition may range from about 1 mg/mL to about 200mg/ml or from about 50 mg/mL to about 200 mg/mL, or from about 150 mg/mLto about 200 mg/mL.

An aqueous formulation of a subject SOD2 variant polypeptide may beprepared in a pH-buffered solution, e.g., at pH ranging from about 4.0to about 7.0, or from about 5.0 to about 6.0, or alternatively about5.5. Examples of buffers that are suitable for a pH within this rangeinclude phosphate-, histidine-, citrate-, succinate-, acetate-buffersand other organic acid buffers. The buffer concentration can be fromabout 1 mM to about 100 mM, or from about 5 mM to about 50 mM,depending, e.g., on the buffer and the desired tonicity of theformulation.

A tonicity agent may be included in the variant SOD2 polypeptideformulation to modulate the tonicity of the formulation. Exemplarytonicity agents include sodium chloride, potassium chloride, glycerinand any component from the group of amino acids, sugars as well ascombinations thereof. In some embodiments, the aqueous formulation isisotonic, although hypertonic or hypotonic solutions may be suitable.The term “isotonic” denotes a solution having the same tonicity as someother solution with which it is compared, such as physiological saltsolution or serum. Tonicity agents may be used in an amount of about 5mM to about 350 mM, e.g., in an amount of 100 mM to 350 nM.

A surfactant may also be added to the variant SOD2 polypeptideformulation to reduce aggregation of the formulated polypeptide and/orminimize the formation of particulates in the formulation and/or reduceadsorption. Exemplary surfactants include polyoxyethylensorbitan fattyacid esters (Tween), polyoxyethylene alkyl ethers (Brij),alkylphenylpolyoxyethylene ethers (Triton-X),polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene copolymer (Poloxamer, Pluronic), andsodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). Examples of suitablepolyoxyethylenesorbitan-fatty acid esters are polysorbate 20, (soldunder the trademark Tween 20™) and polysorbate 80 (sold under thetrademark Tween 80™). Examples of suitable polyethylene-polypropylenecopolymers are those sold under the names Pluronic® F68 or Poloxamer188™. Examples of suitable Polyoxyethylene alkyl ethers are those soldunder the trademark Brij™. Exemplary concentrations of surfactant mayrange from about 0.001% to about 1% w/v.

A lyoprotectant may also be added in order to protect the labile activeingredient (e.g. a protein) against destabilizing conditions during thelyophilization process. For example, known lyoprotectants include sugars(including glucose and sucrose); polyols (including mannitol, sorbitoland glycerol); and amino acids (including alanine, glycine and glutamicacid). Lyoprotectants can be included in an amount of about 10 mM to 500nM.

In some embodiments, a subject formulation includes a subject variantSOD2 polypeptide, and one or more of the above-identified agents (e.g.,a surfactant, a buffer, a stabilizer, a tonicity agent) and isessentially free of one or more preservatives, such as ethanol, benzylalcohol, phenol, m-cresol, p-chlor-m-cresol, methyl or propyl parabens,benzalkonium chloride, and combinations thereof. In other embodiments, apreservative is included in the formulation, e.g., at concentrationsranging from about 0.001 to about 2% (w/v).

Furthermore, a subject variant SOD2 polypeptide can be made intosuppositories by mixing with a variety of bases such as emulsifyingbases or water-soluble bases. A subject variant SOD2 polypeptide can beadministered rectally via a suppository. The suppository can includevehicles such as cocoa butter, carbowaxes and polyethylene glycols,which melt at body temperature, yet are solidified at room temperature.

Unit dosage forms for oral or rectal administration such as syrups,elixirs, and suspensions may be provided wherein each dosage unit, forexample, teaspoonful, tablespoonful, tablet or suppository, contains apredetermined amount of the composition containing one or moreinhibitors. Similarly, unit dosage forms for injection or intravenousadministration may comprise a subject variant SOD2 polypeptide in acomposition as a solution in sterile water, normal saline or anotherpharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

The term “unit dosage form,” as used herein, refers to physicallydiscrete units suitable as unitary dosages for human and animalsubjects, each unit containing a predetermined quantity of a subjectvariant SOD2 polypeptide calculated in an amount sufficient to producethe desired effect in association with a pharmaceutically acceptablediluent, carrier or vehicle. The specifications for a subject variantSOD2 polypeptide may depend on the particular variant SOD2 polypeptideemployed and the effect to be achieved, and the pharmacodynamicsassociated with each polypeptide in the host.

Suitable excipient vehicles are, for example, water, saline, dextrose,glycerol, ethanol, or the like, and combinations thereof. In addition,if desired, the vehicle may contain minor amounts of auxiliarysubstances such as wetting or emulsifying agents or pH buffering agents.Actual methods of preparing such dosage forms are known, or will beapparent, to those skilled in the art. See, e.g., Remington'sPharmaceutical Sciences, Mack Publishing Company, Easton, Pa., 17thedition, 1985. The composition or formulation to be administered will,in any event, contain a quantity of a subject SOD2 variant polypeptideadequate to achieve the desired state in the subject being treated.

In some embodiments, a subject variant SOD2 polypeptide is formulated ina controlled release formulation. Sustained-release preparations may beprepared using methods well known in the art. Suitable examples ofsustained-release preparations include semipermeable matrices of solidhydrophobic polymers containing a subject SOD2 variant polypeptide inwhich the matrices are in the form of shaped articles, e.g. films ormicrocapsules. Examples of sustained-release matrices includepolyesters, copolymers of L-glutamic acid and ethyl-L-glutamate,non-degradable ethylene-vinyl acetate, hydrogels, polylactides,degradable lactic acid-glycolic acid copolymers andpoly-D-(−)-3-hydroxybutyric acid. Possible loss of biological activitymay be prevented or reduced by using appropriate additives, bycontrolling moisture content and by developing specific polymer matrixcompositions.

A subject composition can include a variant SOD2 polypeptide; and mayalso include known antioxidants, buffering agents, and other agents suchas coloring agents, flavorings, vitamins or minerals. For example, asubject formulation may also contain one or more of the followingminerals: calcium citrate (15-350 mg); potassium gluconate (5-150 mg);magnesium citrate (5-15 mg); and chromium picollinate (5-200 μg). Inaddition, a variety of salts may be utilized, including calcium citrate,potassium gluconate, magnesium citrate and chromium picollinate.Thickening agents may be added to the compositions such aspolyvinylpyrrolidone, polyethylene glycol or carboxymethylcellulose.Exemplary additional components of a subject formulation includeassorted colorings or flavorings, vitamins, fiber, milk, fruit juices,enzymes and other nutrients. Exemplary sources of fiber include any of avariety of sources of fiber including, but not limited to: psyllium,rice bran, oat bran, corn bran, wheat bran, fruit fiber and the like.Dietary or supplementary enzymes such as lactase, amylase, glucanase,catalase, and the like can also be included. Chemicals used in thepresent compositions can be obtained from a variety of commercialsources, including, e.g., Spectrum Quality Products, Inc (Gardena,Calif.), Sigma Chemicals (St. Louis, Mo.), Seltzer Chemicals, Inc.,(Carlsbad, Calif.) and Jarchem Industries, Inc., (Newark, N.J.).

A subject formulation may also include a variety of carriers and/orbinders. An exemplary carrier is micro-crystalline cellulose (MCC) addedin an amount sufficient to complete dosage total weight. Carriers can besolid-based dry materials for formulations in tablet, capsule orpowdered form, and can be liquid or gel-based materials for formulationsin liquid or gel forms, which forms depend, in part, upon the routes ofadministration.

Exemplary carriers for dry formulations include, but are not limited to:trehalose, malto-dextrin, rice flour, micro-crystalline cellulose (MCC)magnesium sterate, inositol, fructo-oligosaccharide (FOS),gluco-oligosaccharide (GOS), dextrose, sucrose, and like carriers. Wherethe composition is dry and includes evaporated oils that produce atendency for the composition to cake (adherence of the component spores,salts, powders and oils), dry fillers which distribute the componentsand prevent caking are included. Exemplary anti-caking agents includeMCC, talc, diatomaceous earth, amorphous silica and the like, and aretypically added in an amount of from approximately 1% to 95% by weight.It should also be noted that dry formulations which are subsequentlyrehydrated (e.g., liquid formula) or given in the dry state (e.g.,chewable wafers, pellets, capsules, or tablets) can be used instead ofinitially hydrated formulations. Dry formulations (e.g., powders) may beadded to supplement commercially available foods (e.g., liquid formulas,strained foods, or drinking water supplies). Similarly, the specifictype of formulation depends upon the route of administration

Suitable liquid or gel-based carriers include but are not limited to:water and physiological salt solutions; urea; alcohols and derivatives(e.g., methanol, ethanol, propanol, butanol); glycols (e.g., ethyleneglycol, propylene glycol, and the like). Generally, water-based carrierspossess a neutral pH value (e.g., pH 7.0.+−.1.0 or 0.5 pH units). Thecompositions may also include natural or synthetic flavorings andfood-quality coloring agents, all of which must be compatible withmaintaining viability of the lactic acid-producing microorganism.Well-known thickening agents may also be added to the compositions suchas corn starch, guar gum, xanthan gum, and the like.

A subject variant SOD2 polypeptide can be formulated to be suitable fororal administration in a variety of ways, for example in a liquid, apowdered food supplement, a paste, a gel, a solid food, a packaged food,a wafer, a tablet, a lozenge, a capsule, and the like. Otherformulations will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art.

Although a subject variant SOD2 polypeptide may be directly ingested, orotherwise administered, or used as an additive in conjunction withfoods, it will be appreciated that they may be incorporated into avariety of foods and beverages. The terms “food,” “food product,” and“foodstuff” are used interchangeably herein and include, in addition tofoods commonly consumed by humans and domesticated animals, functionalfoods, pharmafoods, designer foods, and nutraceuticals. Suitable foodsand beverages include, but are not limited to, yogurts, ice creams,cheeses, baked products such as bread, biscuits and cakes, dairy anddairy substitute foods, soy-based food products, grain-based foodproducts, starch-based food products, confectionery products, edible oilcompositions, spreads, breakfast cereals, infant formulas, juices, powerdrinks, and the like. Within the scope of the term “foods” are to beincluded in particular food likely to be classified as functional foods,i.e. “foods that are similar in appearance to conventional foods and areintended to be consumed as part of a normal diet, but have been modifiedto physiological roles beyond the provision of simple nutrientrequirements” (NFA Policy Discussion Paper 7/94).

The present disclosure provides compositions (e.g., nutraceuticalcompositions) comprising a subject variant SOD2 polypeptide and afood-grade pharmaceutically acceptable excipient. In many embodiments,subject nutraceutical compositions include one or more components foundin food products. Thus, the instant invention provides a foodcomposition and products comprising an inactivated probiotic bacteriumand a food component. Suitable components include, but are not limitedto, mono- and disaccharides; carbohydrates; proteins; amino acids; fattyacids; lipids; stabilizers; preservatives; flavoring agents; coloringagents; sweeteners; antioxidants, chelators, and carriers; texturants;nutrients; pH adjusters; emulsifiers; stabilizers; milk base solids;edible fibers; and the like. The food component can be isolated from anatural source, or can be synthesized. All components are food-gradecomponents fit for human consumption.

Methods of Reducing Oxidative Stress and/or Damage

The present disclosure provides methods of reducing oxidative stressand/or damage to a cell, tissue, or organ. In some embodiments, themethods involve contacting a cell, tissue, or organ (in vitro, in vivo,or ex vivo) with an effective amount of a subject variant SOD2polypeptide. In some embodiments, the methods involve contacting a cell,tissue, or organ (in vitro, in vivo, or ex vivo) with combined effectiveamounts of a subject variant SOD2 polypeptide and a SIRT3 polypeptide.In some embodiments, the methods involve contacting a cell, tissue, ororgan (in vitro, in vivo, or ex vivo) with combined effective amounts ofa SOD2 polypeptide and a SIRT3 polypeptide. In some embodiments, themethods involve contacting a cell, tissue, or organ (in vitro, in vivo,or ex vivo) with combined effective amounts of a subject variant SOD2polypeptide and an agent that increases enzymatic activity of SIRT3. Insome embodiments, the methods involve contacting a cell, tissue, ororgan (in vitro, in vivo, or ex vivo) with combined effective amounts ofa subject variant SOD2 polypeptide and an agent that increases the levelof a SIRT3 polypeptide, where an agent that increases the level of aSIRT3 polypeptide includes, e.g., a nucleic acid comprising a nucleotidesequence encoding a SIRT3 polypeptide.

Variant SOD2 Polypeptides

In some embodiments, a subject method of reducing oxidative stressand/or damage to a cell, tissue, or organ involves contacting the cell,tissue, or organ with an effective amount of a subject variant SOD2polypeptide. The variant SOD2 polypeptide will in some instances enter acell, and reduce oxidative damage to the cell and/or oxidative stress inthe cell. A variant SOD2 can be administered to an individual in needthereof to reduce oxidative damage to a cell, tissue, or organ in theindividual and/or reduce oxidative stress in a cell, tissue, or organ inthe individual. Thus, the present disclosure provides methods ofreducing oxidative damage and/or stress to a cell, tissue, or organ inan individual, the methods generally involving administering to theindividual an effective amount of a subject variant SOD2 polypeptide. Insome embodiments, a subject method comprises administering to anindividual in need thereof combined effective amounts of a subjectvariant SOD2 polypeptide and a SIRT3 polypeptide.

An effective amount of a subject variant SOD2 polypeptide is an amountthat reduces the level of ROS in a cell, tissue, or organ by at leastabout 10%, at least about 20%, at least about 25%, at least about 30%,at least about 40%, at least about 50%, at least about 60%, at leastabout 70%, at least about 80%, or more than 80%, compared to the levelof ROS in the cell, tissue, or organ in the absence of a subject variantSOD2 polypeptide.

The oxidative damage is caused by free radicals, such as reactive oxygenspecies (ROS) and/or reactive nitrogen species (RNS). Examples of ROSand RNS include hydroxyl radical (HO.), superoxide anion radical (O₂ ⁻),nitric oxide (NO.), hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), hypochlorous acid (HOCl),and peroxynitrite anion. (ONOO⁻).

An individual in need of a subject treatment method includes anindividual undergoing a treatment associated with oxidative damageand/or stress. For example, the individual may be undergoingreperfusion. Reperfusion refers to the restoration of blood flow to anyorgan or tissue in which the flow of blood is decreased or blocked. Therestoration of blood flow during reperfusion leads to respiratory burstand formation of free radicals. Decreased or blocked blood flow can bedue to hypoxia or ischemia. The loss or severe reduction in blood supplyduring hypoxia or ischemia can be due to thromboembolic stroke, coronaryatherosclerosis, or peripheral vascular disease.

Numerous organs and tissues are subject to ischemia or hypoxia. Examplesof such organs include brain, heart, kidney, intestine, and prostate.The tissue affected can be muscle, such as cardiac, skeletal, or smoothmuscle. For instance, cardiac muscle ischemia or hypoxia is commonlycaused by atherosclerotic or thrombotic blockages which lead to thereduction or loss of oxygen delivery to the cardiac tissues by thecardiac arterial and capillary blood supply. Such cardiac ischemia orhypoxia may cause pain and necrosis of the affected cardiac muscle, andultimately may lead to cardiac failure. Ischemia or hypoxia in skeletalmuscle or smooth muscle may arise from similar causes. For example,ischemia or hypoxia in intestinal smooth muscle or skeletal muscle ofthe limbs may also be caused by atherosclerotic or thrombotic blockages.

The restoration of blood flow (reperfusion) can occur by any methodknown to those in the art. For instance, reperfusion of ischemic cardiactissues may arise from angioplasty, coronary artery bypass graft, or theuse of thrombolytic drugs. Reducing oxidative damage associated withischemia/hypoxia and reperfusion is important because the tissue damageassociated with ischemia/hypoxia and reperfusion is associated with, forexample, myocardial infarction, stroke, and hemorrhagic shock.

Individuals in need of treatment with a subject method includeindividuals with a disease or condition associated with oxidative damageand/or oxidative stress. The oxidative damage and/or oxidative stresscan occur in any cell, tissue, or organ of the mammal. Examples of suchcells, tissues, and organs include, but are not limited to, endothelialcells, epithelial cells, nervous system cells, skin, heart, lung,kidney, and liver. For example, lipid peroxidation and an inflammatoryprocess are associated with oxidative damage.

A subject method is useful for reducing oxidative damage and/oroxidative stress associated with various neurodegenerative diseases andconditions. The neurodegenerative disease can affect any cell, tissue,or organ of the central or peripheral nervous system. Examples of suchcells, tissues, and organs include the brain, spinal cord, neurons,ganglia, Schwann cells, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and microglia.

The neurodegenerative condition can be an acute condition, such as astroke or a traumatic brain or spinal cord injury. In anotherembodiment, the neurodegenerative disease or condition is a chronicneurodegenerative condition. Examples of chronic neurodegenerativediseases associated with damage by free radicals include Parkinson'sdisease, Alzheimer's disease, Huntington's disease and amyotrophiclateral sclerosis.

Other conditions suitable for treatment with a subject method includepreeclampsia; diabetes; and symptoms of and conditions associated withaging, such as age-related macular degeneration, and wrinkles.

A subject method is useful for reducing oxidative damage and/oroxidative stress in an organ of a mammal prior to transplantation. Forexample, a donor organ, when subjected to reperfusion aftertransplantation can be susceptible to oxidative damage. A subjectvariant SOD2 polypeptide can be used to reduce oxidative damage fromreperfusion of the transplanted organ.

The donor organ can be any organ suitable for transplantation. Examplesof such organs include, e.g., heart, liver, kidney, lung, and pancreaticislets. A donor organ is placed in a suitable medium ex vivo, wheresuitable media include a standard buffered solution commonly used in theart.

The present disclosure provides a method for reducing oxidative damageand/or oxidative stress in a cell. Cells include those cells in whichthe cell membrane or DNA of the cell has been damaged, or is at risk ofdamage, by free radicals, for example, ROS and/or RNS. Examples of cellssuitable for treatment using a subject method include, but are notlimited to, skin cells, pancreatic islet cells, myocytes, endothelialcells, neuronal cells, and stem cells. The cells can be in vitro or invivo.

In some embodiments, the cells are in vitro. For example, the cells canbe tissue culture cells. Alternatively, the cells can be obtained from amammal. In one instance, the cells are those that have been damaged byoxidative damage and/or stress as a result of an insult. Such insultsinclude, for example, a disease or condition (e.g., diabetes, etc) orultraviolet radiation (e.g., sun, etc.). For example pancreatic isletcells damaged by oxidative damage and/or stress as a result of diabetescan be obtained from a mammal.

Where a subject method involves administering an effective amount of asubject variant SOD2 polypeptide to an individual, the variant SOD2polypeptide is administered to an individual using any available methodand route suitable for drug delivery, including in vivo and ex vivomethods, as well as systemic and localized routes of administration.

Conventional and pharmaceutically acceptable routes of administrationinclude intranasal, intramuscular, intratracheal, subcutaneous,intradermal, topical application, intravenous, intraarterial, rectal,nasal, oral, and other enteral and parenteral routes of administration.Routes of administration may be combined, if desired, or adjusteddepending upon the variant SOD2 polypeptide and/or the desired effect. Asubject variant SOD2 polypeptide composition can be administered in asingle dose or in multiple doses. In some embodiments, a subject variantSOD2 polypeptide composition is administered orally. In someembodiments, a subject variant SOD2 polypeptide composition isadministered topically to the skin. In some embodiments, a subjectvariant SOD2 polypeptide composition is administered locally. In someembodiments, a subject variant SOD2 polypeptide composition isadministered systemically.

Variant SOD2 Polypeptide and SIRT3

As noted above, in some embodiments, a subject method comprisesadministering to an individual in need thereof combined effectiveamounts of a subject variant SOD2 polypeptide and a SIRT3 polypeptide.The SIRT3 polypeptide can be administered as a polypeptide per se, or asa nucleic acid comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding a SIRT3polypeptide. The nucleic acid comprising a nucleotide sequence encodinga SIRT3 polypeptide can be a recombinant expression vector. Exemplarysuitable expression constructs are described above. A SIRT3 polypeptidecan comprise an amino acid sequence having at least about 85%, at leastabout 90%, at least about 95%, at least about 98%, at least about 99%,or 100%, amino acid sequence identity to a contiguous stretch of fromabout 350 amino acids to about 399 amino acids of the amino acidsequence depicted in FIG. 7 and set forth in SEQ ID NO:28. A suitableSIRT3 nucleic acid can comprise a nucleotide sequence having at leastabout 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, at least about 98%,at least about 99%, or 100%, nucleotide sequence identity to thenucleotide sequence depicted in FIG. 8 and set forth in SEQ ID NO:29.Suitable dosages, formulations, and routes of administration are asdescribed above.

SOD2 and SIRT3

As noted above, in some embodiments, a subject method comprisesadministering to an individual in need thereof combined effectiveamounts of a SOD2 polypeptide and a SIRT3 polypeptide (or a nucleic acidcomprising a nucleotide sequence encoding a SIRT3 polypeptide). Asuitable SOD2 polypeptide comprises an amino acid sequence having atleast about 85%, at least about 90%, at least about 95%, at least about98%, at least about 99%, or 100%, amino acid sequence identity to theamino acid sequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:1. Suitable SIRT3polypeptides, and suitable SIRT3 nucleic acids, are as described above.Suitable dosages, formulations, and routes of administration are asdescribed above.

SOD2 Polypeptide and Agent that Increases SIRT3 Enzymatic Activity

In some embodiments, a subject method of reducing oxidative stressand/or damage to a cell, tissue, or organ involves contacting the cell,tissue, or organ with combined effective amounts of: a) an SOD2polypeptide, which may be a subject variant SOD2 polypeptide; and b) anagent that increases enzymatic activity of a SIRT3 polypeptide. Thecombination therapy can be administered to an individual in need thereofto reduce oxidative damage to a cell, tissue, or organ in the individualand/or reduce oxidative stress in a cell, tissue, or organ in theindividual. Thus, the present disclosure provides methods of reducingoxidative damage and/or stress to a cell, tissue, or organ in anindividual, the methods generally involving administering to theindividual combined effective amounts of a SOD2 polypeptide (which canbe a subject variant SOD2 polypeptide) and an agent that increasesenzymatic activity of a SIRT3 polypeptide.

Agents that increase enzymatic activity of a SIRT3 polypeptide includesmall molecule agents (e.g., agents having a molecular weight in a rangeof greater than 25 daltons and less than about 10,000 daltons, e.g., acandidate agent may have a molecular weight of from about 25 daltons toabout 50 daltons, from about 50 daltons to about 100 daltons, from about100 daltons to about 150 daltons, from about 150 daltons to about 200daltons, from about 200 daltons to about 500 daltons, from about 500daltons to about 1000 daltons, from about 1,000 daltons to about 2500daltons, from about 2500 daltons to about 5000 daltons, from about 5000daltons to about 7500 daltons, or from about 7500 daltons to about10,000 daltons.

Agents that increase enzymatic activity of a SIRT3 polypeptide includeagents that increase enzymatic activity of a SIRT3 polypeptide by atleast about 10%, at least about 25%, at least about 50%, at least about2-fold, at least about 2.5-fold, at least about 5-fold, at least about10-fold, at least about 25-fold, or more than 25-fold.

Agents that increase enzymatic activity of a SIRT3 polypeptide include,e.g., an agent as described in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2011/0046110;U.S. Patent Publication No. 2011/0039847; U.S. Patent Publication No.2011/0015192; U.S. Pat. No. 7,893,086; U.S. Pat. No. 7,855,289; U.S.Pat. No. 7,829,556; and U.S. Pat. No. 7,345,178. In some embodiments, anagent that increases SIRT3 enzymatic activity is selective for SIRT3,e.g., the agent does not substantially have one or more of the followingactivities: inhibition of PI3-kinase, inhibition of aldoreductase,inhibition of tyrosine kinase, transactivation of EGFR tyrosine kinase,coronary dilation, or spasmolytic activity, at concentrations of thecompound that are effective for increasing the deacetylation activity ofSIRT3. In some instances, an agent that increases SIRT3 activity mayalso increase enzymatic SIRT1 activity. In other instances, an agentthat increases SIRT3 enzymatic activity does not substantially increaseSIRT1 enzymatic activity. Assays for determining whether an agentincreases SIRT3 activity are known in the art; a suitable assay isdescribed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,893,086.

A suitable agent that increases SIRT3 activity can increase SIRT3enzymatic activity with an EC₅₀ of from about 1 nM to about 1 mM, e.g.,from about 1 nM to about 10 nM, from about 10 nM to about 15 nM, fromabout 15 nM to about 25 nM, from about 25 nM to about 50 nM, from about50 nM to about 75 nM, from about 75 nM to about 100 nM, from about 100nM to about 150 nM, from about 150 nM to about 200 nM, from about 200 nMto about 250 nM, from about 250 nM to about 300 nM, from about 300 nM toabout 350 nM, from about 350 nM to about 400 nM, from about 400 nM toabout 450 nM, from about 450 nM to about 500 nM, from about 500 nM toabout 750 nM, from about 750 nM to about 1 μM, from about 1 μM to about10 μM, from about 10 μM to about 25 μM, from about 25 μM to about 50 μM,from about 50 μM to about 75 μM, from about 75 μM to about 100 μM, fromabout 100 μM to about 250 μM, from about 250 μM to about 500 μM, or fromabout 500 μM to about 1 mM.

Screening Methods

The present disclosure also provides methods of identifying agents thatincrease the enzymatic activity of a SOD2 polypeptide. The methodsgenerally involve contacting a SOD2 polypeptide with a test agent in thepresence of a substrate for SOD2; and determining the effect, if any, ofthe test agent on the enzymatic activity of the SOD2 polypeptide. Themethod can be carried out in vitro in a cell-free assay system, or canbe carried out in vitro in a cell-based assay system. Thus, the presentdisclosure provides an in vitro cell-free method for identifying anagent that increases the enzymatic activity of a SOD2 polypeptide; andan in vitro cell-based method for identifying an agent that increasesthe enzymatic activity of a SOD2 polypeptide.

As used herein, the term “determining” refers to both quantitative andqualitative determinations and as such, the term “determining” is usedinterchangeably herein with “assaying,” “measuring,” and the like.

The terms “candidate agent,” “test agent,” “agent,” “substance,” and“compound” are used interchangeably herein. Candidate agents encompassnumerous chemical classes, typically synthetic, semi-synthetic, ornaturally-occurring inorganic or organic molecules. Candidate agentsinclude those found in large libraries of synthetic or naturalcompounds. For example, synthetic compound libraries are commerciallyavailable from Maybridge Chemical Co. (Trevillet, Cornwall, UK),ComGenex (South San Francisco, Calif.), and MicroSource (New Milford,Conn.). A rare chemical library is available from Aldrich (Milwaukee,Wis.). Alternatively, libraries of natural compounds in the form ofbacterial, fungal, plant and animal extracts are available from Pan Labs(Bothell, Wash.) or are readily producible.

Candidate agents may be small organic or inorganic compounds having amolecular weight of more than 50 and less than about 10,000 daltons,e.g., a candidate agent may have a molecular weight of from about 50daltons to about 100 daltons, from about 100 daltons to about 150daltons, from about 150 daltons to about 200 daltons, from about 200daltons to about 500 daltons, from about 500 daltons to about 1000daltons, from about 1,000 daltons to about 2500 daltons, from about 2500daltons to about 5000 daltons, from about 5000 daltons to about 7500daltons, or from about 7500 daltons to about 10,000 daltons. Candidateagents may comprise functional groups necessary for structuralinteraction with proteins, particularly hydrogen bonding, and mayinclude at least an amine, carbonyl, hydroxyl or carboxyl group, and maycontain at least two of the functional chemical groups. The candidateagents may comprise cyclical carbon or heterocyclic structures and/oraromatic or polyaromatic structures substituted with one or more of theabove functional groups. Candidate agents are also found amongbiomolecules including peptides, saccharides, fatty acids, steroids,purines, pyrimidines, derivatives, structural analogs or combinationsthereof.

Assays of the invention include controls, where suitable controlsinclude a sample (e.g., a sample comprising the SOD2 polypeptide and theSOD2 substrate in the absence of the test agent). Generally a pluralityof assay mixtures is run in parallel with different agent concentrationsto obtain a differential response to the various concentrations.Typically, one of these concentrations serves as a negative control,i.e. at zero concentration or below the level of detection.

A variety of other reagents may be included in the screening assay.These include reagents like salts, neutral proteins, e.g. albumin,detergents, etc., including agents that are used to facilitate optimalenzyme activity and/or reduce non-specific or background activity.Reagents that improve the efficiency of the assay, such as proteaseinhibitors, anti-microbial agents, etc. may be used. The components ofthe assay mixture are added in any order that provides for the requisiteactivity. Incubations are performed at any suitable temperature,typically between 4° C. and 40° C. Incubation periods are selected foroptimum activity, but may also be optimized to facilitate rapidhigh-throughput screening. Typically between 0.1 hour and 1 hour will besufficient.

A test agent that increases enzymatic activity of the SOD2 polypeptideis a candidate agent for treating a disease or condition related tooxidative stress and/or oxidative damage. For example, a test agent thatincreases enzymatic activity of a SOD2 polypeptide by at least about20%, at least about 25%, at least about 50%, at least about 75%, atleast about 2-fold, at least about 2.5-fold, at least about 5-fold, atleast about 10-fold, or more than 10-fold, compared to the enzymaticactivity of the SOD2 polypeptide in the absence of the test agent, isconsidered a candidate agent for treating a disease or condition relatedto oxidative stress and/or oxidative damage.

In some embodiments, a test compound of interest has an EC₅₀ of fromabout 1 nM to about 1 mM, e.g., from about 1 nM to about 10 nM, fromabout 10 nM to about 15 nM, from about 15 nM to about 25 nM, from about25 nM to about 50 nM, from about 50 nM to about 75 nM, from about 75 nMto about 100 nM, from about 100 nM to about 150 nM, from about 150 nM toabout 200 nM, from about 200 nM to about 250 nM, from about 250 nM toabout 300 nM, from about 300 nM to about 350 nM, from about 350 nM toabout 400 nM, from about 400 nM to about 450 nM, from about 450 nM toabout 500 nM, from about 500 nM to about 750 nM, from about 750 nM toabout from about 1 μM to about 10 μM, from about 10 μM to about 25 μM,from about 25 μM to about 50 μM, from about 50 μM to about 75 μM, fromabout 75 μM to about 100 μM, from about 100 μM to about 250 μM, fromabout 250 μM to about 500 μM, or from about 500 μM to about 1 mM.

Enzymatic activity of a SOD2 polypeptide can be determined using anyknown method, where a suitable method includes that described inSchisler and Singh (1985) Biochem. Genet. 23:291. Other suitable assaysinclude those described in Weydert and Cullen (2010) Nature Protocols5:51; Segura-Aguilar (1993) Chem. Biol. Interact. 86:69. As onenon-limiting example, hydrogen peroxide formed by SOD2 is quantitatedusing a coupled reaction where horseradish peroxidase catalyzes theformation of a fluorescent product,6,6′-diOH-(1,1′-biphenyl)-3,3′-diacetic acid, from 4-OH-phenylaceticacid and hydrogen peroxide. As another non-limiting example, superoxideradical ions, generated by xanthine oxidase conversion of xanthine touric acid and hydrogen peroxide, convert nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) toNBT-diformazan, which absorbs light at 560 nm; SOD2, which uses thesuperoxide ions as substrate, reduces the superoxide ion concentrationand thereby lowers the rate of NBT-diformazan formation. The extent ofreduction in the appearance of NBT-diformazan provides a measure of SODactivity.

A candidate agent can be assessed for any cytotoxic activity it mayexhibit toward a living cell, using well-known assays, such as trypanblue dye exclusion, an MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl-2H-tetrazolium bromide) assay, and the like. Agents that do not exhibitcytotoxic activity are considered candidate agents.

In many embodiments, the screening method is carried out in vitro, in acell-free assay. In some embodiments, the in vitro cell-free assay willemploy a purified SOD2 polypeptide, where “purified” refers to free ofcontaminants or any other undesired components. Purified SOD2polypeptide that is suitable for a subject screening method is at leastabout 50% pure, at least about 60% pure, at least about 70% pure, atleast about 75% pure, at least about 80% pure, at least about 85% pure,at least about 90% pure, at least about 95% pure, at least about 98%pure, at least about 99% pure, or greater than 99% pure.

Purified SOD2 polypeptide will in some embodiments be stabilized byaddition of one or more stabilizing agents, to maintain enzymaticactivity. In some embodiments, a solution of purified SOD2 polypeptidecomprises an aqueous solution comprising a SOD2 polypeptide and fromabout 10% to about 50% glycerol, e.g., from about 10% to about 15%, fromabout 15% to about 20%, from about 20% to about 25%, from about 25% toabout 30%, from about 30% to about 35%, from about 35% to about 40%,from about 40% to about 45%, or from about 45% to about 50% glycerol. Insome embodiments, a solution comprising a SOD2 polypeptide furthercomprises one or more of a chelating agent (e.g., EDTA or EGTA); saltssuch as NaCl, MgCl₂, KCl, and the like; buffers, such as a Tris buffer,phosphate-buffered saline, sodium pyrophosphate buffer, and the like;one or more protease inhibitors; and the like.

A SOD2 polypeptide suitable for use in a subject screening method cancomprise an amino acid sequence having at least about 85%, at leastabout 90%, at least about 95%, at least about 98%, at least about 99%,or 100%, amino acid sequence identity to the amino acid sequence of aSOD2 polypeptide as depicted in FIG. 5.

A SOD2 polypeptide suitable for use in a subject screening method cancomprise an amino acid sequence having at least about 85%, at leastabout 90%, at least about 95%, at least about 98%, at least about 99%,or 100%, amino acid sequence identity to the amino acid sequence of asubject variant SOD2 polypeptide.

A SOD2 polypeptide is readily prepared in a variety of host cells suchas unicellular microorganisms, or cells of multicellular organisms grownin in vitro culture as unicellular entities. Suitable host cells includebacterial cells such as Escherichia coli; yeast cells such asSaccharomyces cerevisiae, Pichia pastoris, Hansenula polymorpha,Kluyveromyces lactis, Yarrowia lipolytica, Candida utilis,Schizosaccharomyces pombe, and the like; insect cells such as Drosophilamelanogaster cells; amphibian cells such as Xenopus cells; mammaliancells, such as CHO cells, 3T3 cells, and the like.

In some embodiments, the in vitro cell-free assay will employ a fusionprotein, comprising a SOD2 polypeptide fused in-frame to a fusionpartner. In some embodiments, the fusion partner is attached to theamino terminus of the SOD2 polypeptide. In other embodiments, the fusionpartner is attached to the carboxyl terminus of the SOD2 polypeptide. Inother embodiments, the fusion partner is fused in-frame to the SOD2polypeptide at a location internal to the SOD2 polypeptide. Suitablefusion partners include immunological tags such as epitope tags,including, but not limited to, hemagglutinin, FLAG, and the like;proteins that provide for a detectable signal, including, but notlimited to, fluorescent proteins, enzymes (e.g., β-galactosidase,luciferase, horse radish peroxidase, etc.), and the like; polypeptidesthat facilitate purification or isolation of the fusion protein, e.g.,metal ion binding polypeptides such as 6H is tags (e.g., SOD2/6H is),glutathione-S-transferase, and the like; polypeptides that provide forsubcellular localization; and polypeptides that provide for secretionfrom a cell.

In some embodiments, the fusion partner is an epitope tag. In someembodiments, the fusion partner is a metal chelating peptide. In someembodiments, the metal chelating peptide is a histidine multimer, e.g.,(His)₆. In some embodiments, a (His)₆ multimer is fused to the aminoterminus of a SOD2 polypeptide; in other embodiments, a (His)₆ multimeris fused to the carboxyl terminus of a SOD2 polypeptide. The (His)₆-SOD2fusion protein is purified using any of a variety of available nickelaffinity columns (e.g. His-bind resin, Novagen).

In some embodiments, a subject screening method is carried out in vitroin a cell, e.g., a cell grown in cell culture as a unicellular entity.Suitable cells include, e.g., eukaryotic cells, e.g., mammalian cellssuch as CHO cells 293 cells, 3R3 cells, and the like.

EXAMPLES

The following examples are put forth so as to provide those of ordinaryskill in the art with a complete disclosure and description of how tomake and use the present invention, and are not intended to limit thescope of what the inventors regard as their invention nor are theyintended to represent that the experiments below are all or the onlyexperiments performed. Efforts have been made to ensure accuracy withrespect to numbers used (e.g. amounts, temperature, etc.) but someexperimental errors and deviations should be accounted for. Unlessindicated otherwise, parts are parts by weight, molecular weight isweight average molecular weight, temperature is in degrees Celsius, andpressure is at or near atmospheric. Standard abbreviations may be used,e.g., bp, base pair(s); kb, kilobase(s); pl, picoliter(s); s or sec,second(s); min, minute(s); h or hr, hour(s); aa, amino acid(s); kb,kilobase(s); bp, base pair(s); nt, nucleotide(s); i.m.,intramuscular(ly); i.p., intraperitoneal(ly); s.c., subcutaneous(ly);and the like.

Example 1 Experimental Procedures Mice

SIRT3^(−/−) mice have been described (Lombard et al., 2007). All micewere housed on a 12:12-hr light:dark cycle at 25° C. Six-month-oldanimals (n=8) were either fed ad libitum (AL) or subjected to a 30%calorie restriction (CR) diet, which was provided daily for 6 months.Respiratory exchange ratio, physical activity and oxygen consumptionwere measured in metabolic cages (Columbus Instruments) for 48 hours(the first day for acclimation and the second day for experiment),according to the manufacturer's instruction. Mice were weighed beforeand after being placed in the cages, and were fed their allotted mealsat the time they were placed in the cages. Measurements were taken every10 minutes. All animal procedures were in accordance with the animalcare committee at the University of California, Berkeley.

RNA and Protein Preparation and Analysis:

Total RNA was extracted from tissues by TRIZOL (Invitrogen) and wasfurther purified with RNeasy mini-kit (Qiagen). For real-time polymerasechain reaction (PCR) analysis, cDNA was synthesized from total RNA bySuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) with random primers.cDNA was subjected to PCR analysis with gene-specific primers in thepresence of CYBR green (Bio-rad). Relative mRNA abundance was obtainedby normalization to cyclophilin A or glyceraldehyde-3-phosphatedehydrogenase (GAPDH) levels.

Proteins from mouse tissues were extracted in lysis buffer (50 mMTris-Cl pH7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 2 mM MgCl₂, 1 mMdithiothreitol (DTT) and 1% NP40) supplemented with a complete proteaseinhibitor cocktail (Roche). Protein extracts were subjected tocentrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 10 min. Protein lysates were preclearedwith protein A beads for 30 min before immunoprecipitation withspecified antibodies for 2 hr-overnight. Immunoprecipitates wereextensively washed with lysis buffer and eluted with 100 mM glycine, pH3.0. Anti-long-chain acyl CoA dehydrogenase (Anti-LCAD) antibody.Acetyl-lysine antibody (Cell signaling, BioLegend). Anti-SOD2 antibody(Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Anti-Flag antibody (Sigma).

Lentiviral Production and Transduction

SIRT3 and SOD2 were cloned into pFUGW lentiviral vector. Lentiviruseswere produced by transient transfection of pFUGW and packaging vectorsinto 293T cells with lipofectamine. Lentiviruses were harvested 48 hposttransfection and filtered through 0.22-μm-pore cellulose acetatefilters. Virus containing media was mixed with fresh media (1:1), andadded to MEF cells in the presence of 8 μg/ml polybrene.

Measurement of Mitochondrial Superoxide Levels

Cells were incubated with 3 μM of Mito-SOX at 37° C. for 15 min prior toflow cytometry analysis.

Enzyme Assays:

Long-chain acyl CoA dehydrogenase (LCAD) activity was measured aspreviously described (Dommes and Kunau, 1976; Izai et al., 1992). Thereaction mixture contained 50 mM potassium phosphate, pH 7.4, 35 μM2,6-dichlorophenolindophenol (DCPIP), 1 mM N-ethylmaleimide (NEM), 1.6mM phenazine methosulfate (PMS) and 500 μg liver lysate with or without50 μM palmitoyl-CoA. OD600 was measured with Spectramax 190 (MolecularDevices). ΔOD600 values derived from reactions in the absence ofpalmitoyl-coA was considered as background.

Superoxide dismutase activity was measured as the inhibition ofnitroblue tetrazolium (NBT) reduction in a xanthine-xanthine oxidasesystem. The assay was performed as described (Schisler and Singh, 1985),and SOD2 specific activity was determined in the presence of 5 mM sodiumcyanide.

Carbonyl Content Measurement:

Protein carbonyls were spectrophotometrically quantified with a carbonylspecific reagent, 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) (Levine et al.,1994). Briefly, 1 ml of 0.5 mg protein was treated with 2000 of 10 mM ofDNPH (dissolved in 2M HCl) for 1 h, and then precipitated by 10%trichloroacetic acid. The pellets were washed with 1:1 (v/v)ethanol:ethyl acetate for 3 times, and solublized in 0.5 ml 0.2% SDS, 20mM Tris-Cl, pH 6.8. Protein concentration in the final solution was thendetermined with a BCA kit (Piercenet), and the absorbance at 360 nm wasmeasured to calculate the carbonyl content. Protein samples treated withHCl, but not with DNPH were used as blanks.

Glutathione Redox Measurement:

Glutathione was measured in mitochondrial fractions isolated from liver(Rebrin et al., 2003). The GSH: GSSG ratio was determined by GlutathioneAssay Kit (BioVision), following the manufacturer's instructions.

Fatty Acid Oxidation Assay:

Liver sections (0.4 g in total) (Huang et al., 2006) or isolated primarywhite adipocytes (100 μl) (Ahmadian et al., 2009) were incubated with 1ml of Krebs-Ringer buffer supplemented with 3 mM glucose, 1% BSA and[¹⁴C]palmitic acid (0.2 μCi/ml) for 30 min or 1 h respectively at 37° C.with gentle shaking. The buffer was then acidified with 200 μl of H₂SO₄(0.5N) and maintained sealed at 37° C. for an additional 30 min. ¹⁴CO₂was trapped by 200 μl of 2-phenylethylamine/methanol (1:1 ratio) andradioactivity was quantified by liquid scintillation.

HNE Measurement:

HNE levels were measured in indicated liver samples with an OxiSelect™HNE-His Adduct ELISA Kit (Cell Biolabs, Inc. San Diego, Calif.)following the instructions.

Statistical Analysis:

Student's t-test was used for statistic analysis and null hypotheseswere rejected at 0.05.

Results Reduction of Oxidative Stress and Damage by Calorie RestrictionRequires SIRT3

We fed SIRT3 knockout (KO) mice (Lombard et al., 2007) and wild-type(WT) littermates a CR diet for 6 months. Food allotted for CR mice was70% of the ad libitum (AL) values and was administered once daily. Wefirst analyzed SIRT3 expression in mice fed an AL or CR diet. SIRT3protein levels were higher in livers and white adipose tissues (WATs) ofCR mice than AL controls (FIG. 1A). The CR-induced SIRT3 upregulationlikely occurs at the transcriptional level, since SIRT3 mRNA was alsoincreased (1.4-fold for liver and 3.2-fold for WAT) (FIG. 1B). IncreasedSIRT3 expression has also been observed in muscle and brown adiposetissue of CR mice (Palacios et al., 2009; Shi et al., 2005). CR alsoinduces an increase in mitochondrial NAD⁺ levels (Nakagawa et al.,2009), suggesting that SIRT3 activity is likely to be upregulated duringCR.

To investigate whether SIRT3 is required for CR to reduce oxidativestress, we compared oxidative damage to proteins and lipids, as well asthe glutathione redox state (the GSH:GSSG ratio), a common measure ofoxidative stress, between WT and SIRT3 KO mice fed AL or CR diets.Consistent with earlier reports, CR significantly reduced oxidativedamage and stress in WT mice (Merry, 2004; Rebrin et al., 2003), asshown by levels of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (HNE), a marker for lipidperoxidation (FIG. 1C), protein carbonyl content, a protein oxidativemodification (FIG. 1D), and the GSH:GSSG ratio (FIG. 1E). However, thereduction in oxidative stress and damage under CR was not observed inSIRT3 KO mice (FIG. 1C-E), suggesting that SIRT3 is required forreducing oxidative stress during CR. Consistent with these results,overexpression of SIRT3 is sufficient to reduce cellular ROS levels (Shiet al., 2005).

SIRT3 is Required for the Calorie Restriction-Induced Metabolic Switchto Fatty Acid Oxidation

Next, we investigated the mechanism by which SIRT3 reduces oxidativestress during CR. CR was hypothesized to reduce ROS production bytriggering a metabolic switch from glucose to fatty acid oxidation (FAO)(Guarente, 2008). Compared to glucose oxidation, FAO during respirationpreferably bypasses a major site of ROS production, the complex I of theelectron transport chain. To test whether SIRT3 reduces ROS productionby triggering the metabolic switch from glucose to FAO during CR, wecompared calorie restricted WT and SIRT3 KO mice for their respiratoryexchange ratio (RER), an indicator of which fuel (carbohydrate or fat)is being metabolized to supply the body with energy. The RER of the CRmice was recorded for one feeding cycle (24 hours) starting from whenthe mice were provided with their daily quota of food. Six hours afterfeeding, the RER for calorie restricted WT mice dropped below 1,indicating a shift from glucose to FAO (FIG. 2A). However, this shiftwas delayed 2 hours in calorie restricted SIRT3 KO mice, and the RER forcalorie restricted SIRT3 KO mice remained higher than WT controls until10 hours after feeding. These observations indicate that SIRT3 caninfluence the metabolic switch to FAO that normally occurs during CR. Tofurther confirm that calorie restricted SIRT3 KO mice are deficient inFAO, we directly measured the beta-oxidation rates for long-chain fattyacids in livers and WATs. The beta-oxidation rates, determined by theoxidation of palmitate to CO₂ (Ahmadian et al., 2009), were decreased by40% in calorie restricted SIRT3 KO mice in comparison to WT controls 7hours after feeding (FIG. 2B).

Despite the defects in FAO, calorie restricted SIRT3 KO mice hadcomparable metabolic rate as WT controls, measured by daily oxygenconsumption normalized by their body weight. Consistently, calorierestricted WT and SIRT3 KO mice had comparable physical activity, foodintake, and body weight, indicating that interfering with SIRT3 functiondoes not affect the metabolic rate and that SIRT3 does not reduceoxidative stress by changing the metabolic rate during CR.

Long-Chain Acyl CoA Dehydrogenase is Activated Via SIRT3 DeacetylationDuring Calorie Restriction, Contributing to the Reduction of CellularROS

SIRT3 increases FAO during short-term fasting by deacetylating andactivating long-chain acyl CoA dehydrogenase (LCAD), the enzyme thatcatalyzes the first step of beta-oxidation (Hirschey et al., 2010). Totest whether SIRT3 regulates the metabolic switch to FAO during CR bydeacetylating and activating LCAD, we compared acetylation levels ofLCAD and its enzymatic activity in the livers of WT and SIRT3 KO micefed AL or CR diets. To assess the acetylation levels of LCAD in mousetissues, endogenous proteins were immunoprecipitated withanti-acetyllysine antibody and analyzed by western blotting with LCADspecific antibody. LCAD acetylation was decreased during CR in WT butnot SIRT3 KO mice (FIG. 2C). Endogenous LCAD activity was determinedusing tissue lysates in a well-established assay by quantifying theoxidation of palmitoyl-CoA (Izai et al., 1992). In parallel to itsacetylation status, we observed a 50% increase in enzymatic activity ofLCAD in WT but not SIRT3 KO mice during CR (FIG. 2D). Thus,hyperacetylation and inactivation of LCAD might account for decreasedFAO in calorie restricted SIRT3 KO mice.

To determine whether SIRT3 requires LCAD to mediate the reduction ofcellular ROS, we overexpressed SIRT3 in WT or LCAD-deficient mouseembryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) via lentiviral transduction, and quantifiedcellular ROS levels by MitoSox, a mitochondrial superoxide indicator.Endogenous ROS levels in LCAD-deficient MEFs were higher than those inWT controls (FIG. 2E), consistent with the notion that dysregulation ofFAO increases oxidative stress (Kabuyama et al., 2010). SIRT3overexpression reduced cellular ROS levels by 30% in WT MEFs. Incontrast, the reduction of ROS mediated by SIRT3 overexpression was 40%lower in LCAD-deficient MEFs than in WT controls. These results indicatethat SIRT3 reduces cellular ROS via LCAD. However, other mechanism(s)also contribute to this process.

SIRT3 Activates SOD2 via Deacetylation

Cellular ROS levels represent the integration of two distinct processes:ROS production during respiration and ROS detoxification by antioxidants(Balaban et al., 2005). We next investigated whether SIRT3 also reducesoxidative stress by promoting ROS detoxification. SOD2 was identified inscreens of acetylated peptides (Choudhary et al., 2009; Kim et al.,2006; Schwer et al., 2009). Because SOD2 is located in the mitochondria,we tested the possibility that SIRT3 regulates its acetylation state. Totest whether SIRT3 interacts with SOD2, we overexpressed Flag-taggedSIRT3 in 293T cells and SIRT3-associated proteins were immunopurified(anti-Flag). The association of SOD2 with SIRT3 was detected by westernblotting with SOD2 antibody (FIG. 3A). Additionally, we also transfectedFlag-tagged SOD2 into 293T cells and the presence of SIRT3 in theimmunopurified SOD2 complex was confirmed by western blotting with SIRT3antibody (FIG. 3B). Finally, we examined whether the interaction betweenSIRT3 and SOD2 is physiologically relevant by carrying outimmunoprecipitation with liver extracts. SIRT3 was co-immunoprecipitatedwith SOD2 antibody (FIG. 3C).

To test whether SIRT3 deacetylates SOD2, we co-transfected Flag-taggedSOD2 with SIRT3 or enzymatically inactive SIRT3-H248Y into 293T cells.Acetylation levels for SOD2 were measured after immunoprecipitation bywestern blotting with anti-acetyllysine antibody. SIRT3, but notSIRT3-H248Y, deacetylated SOD2 (FIG. 3D). To identify which lysineresidue(s) on SOD2 are targeted by SIRT3 for deacetylation, we mutatedlysines (K68, K122, and K130) that have been shown to be acetylated inmass spectrometry-based acetylation proteomic surveys (Choudhary et al.,2009; Kim et al., 2006; Schwer et al., 2009). SOD2 mutants wereoverexpressed in 293T cells with or without SIRT3, immunopurified, andtheir acetylation status was measured. Surprisingly, mutating thesethree lysine residues did not significantly reduce the overallacetylation levels of SOD2 (FIG. 3E). Additionally, SIRT3 co-expressionreduced acetylation levels of these three SOD2 mutants, indicating thatthese three lysines are unlikely to be the major acetylation sites onSOD2.

Protein sequence alignment studies showed that two lysines (K53 and K89)adjacent to the active site of SOD2 are highly conserved across species(FIG. 3F). Acetylation levels of SOD2 were decreased when these twolysines were mutated individually (K53R and K89R) or simultaneously(K53/89R) (FIG. 3E, G). SIRT3 co-expression further decreasedacetylation levels of K53R and K89R, but not K53/89R. Collectively,these studies identified K53 and K89 as the acetylation sites on SOD2targeted by SIRT3.

To determine whether the acetylation state of SOD2 modifies itsenzymatic activity, Flag-tagged SOD2 was overexpressed in 293T cellswith SIRT3 or with SIRT3-H248Y, purified by immunoprecipitation, andtheir enzymatic activity was determined by measuring superoxideconversion colorimetrically (Schisler and Singh, 1985). Overexpressionof WT SIRT3 decreased the acetylation of SOD2 (FIG. 3D, E, G) andsignificantly increased its enzymatic activity (FIG. 3H). In contrast,overexpression of SIRT3-H248Y had the opposite effect. Additionally, theenzymatic activity of SOD2 K53/89R, which has two acetylation sitesmutated to arginine to mimic the constitutively deacetylated state, was100% higher than the WT control and SIRT3 did not further increase itsenzymatic activity (FIG. 3I). Thus, SIRT3 promotes the enzymaticactivity of SOD2 by deacetylating two critical lysine residues adjacentto the active site. Conceivably, these two lysine residues, whenexposed, increase the positive charge around the active site and improvethe efficiency of trapping the negatively charged superoxide.

SIRT3 Reduces Cellular ROS Levels by Deacetylating SOD2

To determine whether SIRT3 reduces cellular ROS levels by deacetylatingSOD2, we overexpressed SOD2 or SOD2 K53/89R with or without SIRT3 intoSIRT3 KO MEFs and assessed cellular ROS levels. Surprisingly,overexpression of SOD2 6-fold above the endogenous levels onlymarginally decreased cellular ROS levels (10%) (FIG. 3J). However,co-expression of SIRT3 and SOD2 almost depleted cellular ROS.Additionally, the constitutively deacetylated SOD2 (K53/89R) alone alsodiminished cellular ROS. These results indicate that increasing SOD2expression is not sufficient to effectively reduce cellular ROS until itis activated via deacetylation by SIRT3.

To determine to what extent SOD2 contributes to the reduction ofcellular ROS mediated by SIRT3, we overexpressed SIRT3 in WT and SOD2 KOMEFs via lentiviral transduction and assessed cellular ROS levels.Reduction of cellular ROS mediated by SIRT3 was decreased 90% in SOD2 KOMEFs compared to WT controls (FIG. 3K), indicating that SOD2 is themajor downstream mediator of SIRT3 in reducing cellular ROS.

SOD2 is Activated by SIRT3-Mediated Deacetylation During CalorieRestriction

Based on the results that SIRT3 is induced by CR and that SIRT3deacetylates and activates SOD2, we speculated that SIRT3 mightdeacetylate SOD2 and increase its antioxidative activity in CR animals.We compared the acetylation levels of SOD2 and its antioxidativeactivity in WT and SIRT3 KO mice fed AL or CR diets. To assess theacetylation levels of SOD2 in mouse tissues, endogenous proteins wereimmunoprecipitated with anti-SOD2 antibody and analyzed by westernblotting using acetyl-lysine antibody. Endogenous SOD2 was acetylatedand became deacetylated during CR in WT mice (FIG. 4A). However,CR-induced SOD2 deacetylation was not observed in SIRT3 KO mice,demonstrating that SIRT3 is necessary for SOD2 deacetylation during CR.We next determined endogenous SOD2 activity using tissue lysates asdescribed (Schisler and Singh, 1985). CR induced a 50% increase in SOD2activity in the WATs of WT mice (FIG. 4B) and a modest but significantincrease in liver. Importantly, this increase in SOD2 activity under CRwas lost in SIRT3 KO mice (FIG. 4B). These results suggest that duringCR, SIRT3 reduces oxidative stress by activating SOD2 and promoting thedetoxification of ROS.

FIGS. 1A-E. Reduction of Oxidative Stress and Damage by CalorieRestriction Requires SIRT3.

(A, B) SIRT3 is upregulated during calorie restriction. The expressionlevels of SIRT3 in livers and WATs of mice fed AL or calorie restrictedwere determined by western blotting (A) or RT-PCR (B). n=5. *P<0.05. (C,D, E) Reduction of oxidative stress and damage by CR is dependent onSIRT3. Liver lysates from WT and SIRT3 KO mice fed an AL or CR diet wereassayed for lipid peroxidation (C), protein carbonyl formation (D), andthe GSH:GSSG ratio (E).

FIGS. 2A-E. Calorie Restriction Induces a Metabolic Switch to Fatty AcidOxidation Dependent on SIRT3.

(A, B) SIRT3 KO mice are defective in the metabolic switch to FAO duringCR. (A) Calorie restricted WT and SIRT3 KO mice were housed in metabolicchambers for 24 hours for acclimation. Respiratory exchange ratio (RER)was measured in metabolic chambers for one feeding cycle (24 hours)starting from when the mice were provided with daily quota of food. n=8.(B) Livers and WATs of WT and SIRT3 KO mice fed an AL or CR diet wereharvested 7 hours after feeding and beta-oxidation rates in thesetissues were quantified by the conversion of palmitate to CO₂. (C, D)SIRT3 deacetylates and activates LCAD in CR mice. The acetylation levelsof LCAD (C) and its enzymatic activity (D) in the liver lysates from WTand SIRT3 KO mice fed an AL or CR diet were determined. Liver tissueswere harvested from CR mice 7 hours after feeding. Acetylated LCAD wasisolated from the liver lysate by immunoprecipitation withanti-acetyl-lysine antibody followed by western blotting with anti-LCADantibody. LCAD activity was determined as described (Izai et al., 1992).(E) SIRT3 reduces cellular ROS via LCAD. SIRT3 was overexpressed in WTand LCAD KO MEFs via lentiviral transduction and the cellular ROS levelswere quantified by MitoSox staining.

FIGS. 3A-K. SIRT3 Reduces Cellular ROS Levels by Deacetylating andActivating SOD2.

(A, B, C) SIRT3 physically interacts with SOD2 in vivo. (A) Flag-taggedSIRT3 was transfected into 293T cells, immunopurified, followed bywestern blotting with anti-SOD2. (B) Flag-tagged SOD2 was transfectedinto 293T cells. The association of SIRT3 with immunopurified Flag-SOD2was detected by western blotting with anti-SIRT3 antibody. (C)Endogenous SOD2 was immunopurified from liver lysates with anti-SOD2antibody, followed by western blotting with anti-SIRT3 antibody. (D-G)SIRT3 deacetylates two critical lysine residues on SOD2 in vivo. (D, E,G) Flag-tagged SOD2 or SOD2 mutants were co-transfected with a controlvector, SIRT3, or SIRT3-H248Y into 293T cells. ImmunopurifiedFlag-tagged SOD2 was examined for its acetylation levels by westernblotting with anti-acetyl-lysine antibody. (F) Sequence alignment ofSOD2 from various species. Residues (HS0 and H98) coordinating the metalcenter are shaded. Conserved lysines (K53 and K89) are in bold. (H, I)SIRT3 activates SOD2 by deacetylating two critical lysine residues invivo. Flag-tagged SOD2 or SOD2 K53/89R was co-transfected with a controlvector, SIRT3, or SIRT3-H248Y into 293T cells. The antioxidativeactivity of immunopurified SOD2 was determined by conversion ofsuperoxide colormetrically as described (Schisler and Singh, 1985). (J)SIRT3 reduces cellular ROS by deacetylating SOD2. SOD2 or SOD2 K53/89Rmutant was overexpression with or without SIRT3 in SIRT3 KO MEFs, andcellular ROS levels were determined by MitoSox staining. (K) SIRT3reduces cellular ROS via SOD2. SIRT3 was overexpressed in WT and SOD2 KOMEFs via lentiviral transduction and cellular ROS levels were quantifiedby MitoSox staining.

FIGS. 4A-C. Activation of SOD2 During Calorie Restriction is SIRT3Dependent.

(A) SIRT3 deacetylates SOD2 in CR mice. The acetylation levels of SOD2in WT and SIRT3 KO mice fed an AL or CR diet were determined. Endogenousacetylated SOD2 was isolated by immunoprecipitation with anti-SOD2antibody followed by western blotting with anti-acetyl-lysine antibody.(B) SIRT3 increases the antioxidative activity of SOD2 in CR mice. Theantioxidative activity of SOD2 in WATs of WT and SIRT3 KO mice fed an ALor CR diet were determined (Schisler and Singh, 1985). (C) A proposedmodel on how SIRT3 mediates the CR response.

REFERENCES

-   Ahmadian, M., Duncan, R. E., Varady, K. A., Frasson, D.,    Hellerstein, M. K., Birkenfeld, A. L., Samuel, V. T., Shulman, G.    I., Wang, Y., Kang, C., and Sul, H. S. (2009). Adipose    overexpression of desnutrin promotes fatty acid use and attenuates    diet-induced obesity. Diabetes 58, 855-866.-   Baba, T., Shimizu, T., Suzuki, Y., Ogawara, M., Isono, K., Koseki,    H., Kurosawa, H., and Shirasawa, T. (2005). Estrogen, insulin, and    dietary signals cooperatively regulate longevity signals to enhance    resistance to oxidative stress in mice. J Biol Chem 280,    16417-16426. Balaban, R. S., Nemoto, S., and Finkel, T. (2005).    Mitochondria, oxidants, and aging. Cell 120, 483-495.-   Chen, D., Steele, A. D., Lindquist, S., and Guarente, L. (2005).    Increase in activity during calorie restriction requires Sirtl.    Science 310, 1641.-   Choudhary, C., Kumar, C., Gnad, F., Nielsen, M. L., Rehman, M.,    Walther, T. C., Olsen, J. V., and Mann, M. (2009). Lysine    acetylation targets protein complexes and co-regulates major    cellular functions. Science 325, 834-840.-   Cohen, D. E., Supinski, A. M., Bonkowski, M. S., Donmez, G., and    Guarente, L. P. (2009). Neuronal SIRT1 regulates endocrine and    behavioral responses to calorie restriction. Genes Dev 23,    2812-2817.-   Cohen, H. Y., Miller, C., Bitterman, K. J., Wall, N. R., Hekking,    B., Kessler, B., Howitz, K. T., Gorospe, M., de Cabo, R., and    Sinclair, D. A. (2004). Calorie restriction promotes mammalian cell    survival by inducing the SIRT1 deacetylase. Science 305, 390-392.-   Colman, R. J., Anderson, R. M., Johnson, S. C., Kastman, E. K.,    Kosmatka, K. J., Beasley, T. M., Allison, D. B., Cruzen, C.,    Simmons, H. A., Kemnitz, J. W., and Weindruch, R. (2009). Caloric    restriction delays disease onset and mortality in rhesus monkeys.    Science 325, 201-204.-   Colom, B., Oliver, J., Roca, P., and Garcia-Palmer, F. J. (2007).    Caloric restriction and gender modulate cardiac muscle mitochondrial    H2O2 production and oxidative damage. Cardiovasc Res 74, 456-465.-   Dommes, V., and Kunau, W. H. (1976). A convenient assay for    acyl-CoA-dehydrogenases. Anal Biochem 71, 571-578.-   Frye, R. A. (2000). Phylogenetic classification of prokaryotic and    eukaryotic Sir2-like proteins. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 273,    793-798.-   Guarente, L. (2008). Mitochondria—a nexus for aging, calorie    restriction, and sirtuins? Cell 132, 171-176.-   Hauck, S. J., Hunter, W. S., Danilovich, N., Kopchick, J. J., and    Bartke, A. (2001). Reduced levels of thyroid hormones, insulin, and    glucose, and lower body core temperature in the growth hormone    receptor/binding protein knockout mouse. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 226,    552-558.-   Hirschey, M. D., Shimazu, T., Goetzman, E., Jing, E., Schwer, B.,    Lombard, D. B., Grueter, C. A., Harris, C., Biddinger, S.,    Ilkayeva, O. R., Stevens, R. D., Li, Y., Saha, A. K., Ruderman, N.    B., Bain, J. R., Newgard, C. B., Farese, R. V., Jr., Alt, F. W.,    Kahn, C. R., and Verdin, E. (2010). SIRT3 regulates mitochondrial    fatty-acid oxidation by reversible enzyme deacetylation. Nature 464,    121-125.-   Huang, W., Dedousis, N., Bandi, A., Lopaschuk, G. D., and    O'Doherty, R. M. (2006). Liver triglyceride secretion and lipid    oxidative metabolism are rapidly altered by leptin in vivo.    Endocrinology 147, 1480-1487.-   Imai, S., Armstrong, C. M., Kaeberlein, M., and Guarente, L. (2000).    Transcriptional silencing and longevity protein Sir2 is an    NAD-dependent histone deacetylase. Nature 403, 795-800.-   Izai, K., Uchida, Y., Orii, T., Yamamoto, S., and Hashimoto, T.    (1992). Novel fatty acid beta-oxidation enzymes in rat liver    mitochondria. I. Purification and properties of very-long-chain    acyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase. J Biol Chem 267, 1027-1033.-   Kabuyama, Y., Suzuki, T., Nakazawa, N., Yamaki, J., Homma, M. K.,    and Homma, Y. (2010). Dysregulation of very long chain acyl-CoA    dehydrogenase coupled with lipid peroxidation. Am J Physiol Cell    Physiol 298, C107-113.-   Kaeberlein, M., McVey, M., and Guarente, L. (1999). The SIR2/3/4    complex and SIR2 alone promote longevity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae    by two different mechanisms. Genes Dev 13, 2570-2580.-   Kim, H. S., Patel, K., Muldoon-Jacobs, K., Bisht, K. S.,    Aykin-Burns, N., Pennington, J. D., van der Meer, R., Nguyen, P.,    Savage, J., Owens, K. M., Vassilopoulos, A., Ozden, O., Park, S. H.,    Singh, K. K., Abdulkadir, S. A., Spitz, D. R., Deng, C. X., and    Gius, D. SIRT3 Is a Mitochondria-Localized Tumor Suppressor Required    for Maintenance of Mitochondrial Integrity and Metabolism during    Stress. Cancer Cell 17, 41-52.-   Kim, S. C., Sprung, R., Chen, Y., Xu, Y., Ball, H., Pei, J., Cheng,    T., Kho, Y., Xiao, H., Xiao, L., Grishin, N. V., White, M., Yang, X.    J., and Zhao, Y. (2006). Substrate and functional diversity of    lysine acetylation revealed by a proteomics survey. Mol Cell 23,    607-618.-   Levine, R. L., Williams, J. A., Stadtman, E. R., and Shacter, E.    (1994). Carbonyl assays for determination of oxidatively modified    proteins. Methods Enzymol 233, 346-357.-   Li, Y., Xu, W., McBurney, M. W., and Longo, V. D. (2008). SirT1    inhibition reduces IGF-1/IRS-2/Ras/ERK1/2 signaling and protects    neurons. Cell Metab 8, 38-48.-   Lin, S. J., Defossez, P. A., and Guarente, L. (2000). Requirement of    NAD and SIR2 for life-span extension by calorie restriction in    Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 289, 2126-2128.-   Lombard, D. B., Alt, F. W., Cheng, H. L., Bunkenborg, J.,    Streeper, R. S., Mostoslaysky, R., Kim, J., Yancopoulos, G.,    Valenzuela, D., Murphy, A., Yang, Y., Chen, Y., Hirschey, M. D.,    Bronson, R. T., Haigis, M., Guarente, L. P., Farese, R. V., Jr.,    Weissman, S., Verdin, E., and Schwer, B. (2007). Mammalian Sir2    homolog SIRT3 regulates global mitochondrial lysine acetylation. Mol    Cell Biol 27, 8807-8814.-   Masoro, E. J., Yu, B. P., and Bertrand, H. A. (1982). Action of food    restriction in delaying the aging process. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA    79, 4239-4241.-   Merry, B. J. (2004). Oxidative stress and mitochondrial function    with aging—the effects of calorie restriction. Aging Cell 3, 7-12.-   Nakagawa, T., Lomb, D. J., Haigis, M. C., and Guarente, L. (2009).    SIRT5 Deacetylates carbamoyl phosphate synthetase 1 and regulates    the urea cycle. Cell 137, 560-570.-   Nisoli, E., Tonello, C., Cardile, A., Cozzi, V., Bracale, R.,    Tedesco, L., Falcone, S., Valerio, A., Cantoni, O., Clementi, E.,    Moncada, S., and Carruba, M. O. (2005). Calorie restriction promotes    mitochondrial biogenesis by inducing the expression of eNOS. Science    310, 314-317.-   Onyango, P., Celic, I., McCaffery, J. M., Boeke, J. D., and    Feinberg, A. P. (2002). SIRT3, a human SIR2 homologue, is an    NAD-dependent deacetylase localized to mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad    Sci USA 99, 13653-13658.-   Palacios, O. M., Carmona, J. J., Michan, S., Chen, K. Y., Manabe,    Y., Iii, J. L., Goodyear, L. J., and Tong, Q. (2009). Diet and    exercise signals regulate SIRT3 and activate AMPK and PGC-1alpha in    skeletal muscle. Aging (Albany N.Y.) 1, 771-783.-   Perez, V. I., Bokov, A., Van Remmen, H., Mele, J., Ran, Q., Ikeno,    Y., and Richardson, A. (2009). Is the oxidative stress theory of    aging dead? Biochim Biophys Acta 1790, 1005-1014.-   Rebrin, I., Kamzalov, S., and Sohal, R. S. (2003). Effects of age    and caloric restriction on glutathione redox state in mice. Free    Radic Biol Med 35, 626-635.-   Rogina, B., and Helfand, S. L. (2004). Sir2 mediates longevity in    the fly through a pathway related to calorie restriction. Proc Natl    Acad Sci USA 101, 15998-16003.-   Schisler, N. J., and Singh, S. M. (1985). Tissue-specific    developmental regulation of superoxide dismutase (SOD-1 and SOD-2)    activities in genetic strains of mice. Biochem Genet. 23, 291-308.-   Schriner, S. E., Linford, N. J., Martin, G. M., Treuting, P.,    Ogburn, C. E., Emond, M., Coskun, P. E., Ladiges, W., Wolf, N., Van    Remmen, H., Wallace, D. C., and Rabinovitch, P. S. (2005). Extension    of murine life span by overexpression of catalase targeted to    mitochondria. Science 308, 1909-1911.-   Schulz, T. J., Zarse, K., Voigt, A., Urban, N., Birringer, M., and    Ristow, M. (2007). Glucose restriction extends Caenorhabditis    elegans life span by inducing mitochondrial respiration and    increasing oxidative stress. Cell Metab 6, 280-293.-   Schwer, B., Eckersdorff, M., Li, Y., Silva, J. C., Fermin, D.,    Kurtev, M. V., Giallourakis, C., Comb, M. J., Alt, F. W., and    Lombard, D. B. (2009). Calorie restriction alters mitochondrial    protein acetylation. Aging Cell 8, 604-606.-   Schwer, B., North, B. J., Frye, R. A., Ott, M., and Verdin, E.    (2002). The human silent information regulator (Sir)2 homologue    hSIRT3 is a mitochondrial nicotinamide adenine    dinucleotide-dependent deacetylase. J Cell Biol 158, 647-657.-   Shi, T., Wang, F., Stieren, E., and Tong, Q. (2005). SIRT3, a    mitochondrial sirtuin deacetylase, regulates mitochondrial function    and thermogenesis in brown adipocytes. J Biol Chem 280, 13560-13567.-   Sinclair, D. A. (2005). Toward a unified theory of caloric    restriction and longevity regulation. Mech Ageing Dev 126, 987-1002.-   Sohal, R. S., and Weindruch, R. (1996). Oxidative stress, caloric    restriction, and aging. Science 273, 59-63.-   Sundaresan, N. R., Gupta, M., Kim, G., Rajamohan, S. B., Isbatan,    A., and Gupta, M. P. (2009).-   Sirt3 blocks the cardiac hypertrophic response by augmenting    Foxo3a-dependent antioxidant defense mechanisms in mice. J Clin    Invest 119, 2758-2771.-   Taguchi, A., Wartschow, L. M., and White, M. F. (2007). Brain IRS2    signaling coordinates life span and nutrient homeostasis. Science    317, 369-372.-   Tissenbaum, H. A., and Guarente, L. (2001). Increased dosage of a    sir-2 gene extends lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 410,    227-230.-   Van Remmen, H., Guo, Z., and Richardson, A. (2001). The anti-ageing    action of dietary restriction. Novartis Found Symp 235, 221-230;    discussion 230-223.-   Wallace, D. C., and Fan, W. (2009). The pathophysiology of    mitochondrial disease as modeled in the mouse. Genes Dev 23,    1714-1736.-   Weindruch, R.a.W., R. L. (1988). The retardation of aging and    disease by dietary restriction.-   Yamamoto, M., Clark, J. D., Pastor, J. V., Gurnani, P., Nandi, A.,    Kurosu, H., Miyoshi, M., Ogawa, Y., Castrillon, D. H.,    Rosenblatt, K. P., and Kuro-o, M. (2005). Regulation of oxidative    stress by the anti-aging hormone klotho. J Biol Chem 280,    38029-38034.

While the present invention has been described with reference to thespecific embodiments thereof, it should be understood by those skilledin the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may besubstituted without departing from the true spirit and scope of theinvention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt aparticular situation, material, composition of matter, process, processstep or steps, to the objective, spirit and scope of the presentinvention. All such modifications are intended to be within the scope ofthe claims appended hereto.

What is claimed is:
 1. A variant superoxide dismutase-2 (SOD2)polypeptide, wherein the variant SOD2 polypeptide comprises amino acidsubstitutions of at least K53 and K89, compared to the amino acidsequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:1, and wherein the variant SOD2polypeptide exhibits enzymatic activity that is at least 50% higher thanthe enzymatic activity of a SOD2 polypeptide comprising the amino acidsequence set forth in SEQ ID NO:1.
 2. A composition comprising a variantsuperoxide dismutase-2 (SOD2) polypeptide of claim
 1. 3. An isolatednucleic acid comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding a variantsuperoxide dismutase-2 (SOD2) polypeptide of claim
 1. 4. A recombinantexpression vector comprising a nucleic acid comprising a nucleotidesequence encoding a variant superoxide dismutase-2 (SOD2) polypeptide ofclaim
 1. 5. A pharmaceutical composition comprising a variant superoxidedismutase-2 (SOD2) polypeptide of claim
 1. 6. The pharmaceuticalcomposition of claim 5, wherein the composition comprises at least onefood-grade component.
 7. A method of reducing oxidative damage and/oroxidative stress in a cell, the method comprising contacting the cellwith a variant superoxide dismutase-2 (SOD2) polypeptide of claim 1,wherein the variant SOD2 polypeptide enters the cell and reducesoxidative damage and/or stress in the cell.
 8. The method of claim 7,wherein the cell is a mammalian cell.
 9. A method of treating a diseaseor condition related to oxidative stress and/or oxidative damage in anindividual, the method comprising administering to the individual aneffective amount of a variant superoxide dismutase-2 (SOD2) polypeptideof claim
 1. 10. The method of claim 9, further comprising administeringan effective amount of a SIRT3 polypeptide or a recombinant expressionvector comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding a SIRT3 polypeptide.11. The method of claim 9, further comprising administering an effectiveamount of an agent that increases enzymatic activity of a SIRT3polypeptide.
 12. A method of treating a disease or condition related tooxidative stress and/or oxidative damage in an individual, the methodcomprising administering to the individual combined effective amountsof: a) a SOD2 polypeptide; and b) a SIRT3 polypeptide or a recombinantexpression vector comprising a nucleotide sequence encoding a SIRT3polypeptide.
 13. An in vitro method of identifying an agent thatincreases enzymatic activity of a superoxide dismutatase-2 (SOD2)polypeptide, the method comprising: contacting the SOD2 polypeptide withone or more test compounds; determining whether the test agent increasesenzymatic activity of the SOD2 polypeptide, wherein a test agent thatincreases enzymatic activity of the SOD2 polypeptide is considered acandidate agent for treating a disease or condition related to oxidativestress and/or oxidative damage.
 14. The method of claim 13, wherein theSOD2 polypeptide comprises an amino acid sequence having at least about90% amino acid sequence identity to an amino acid sequence set forth inFIG.
 5. 15. The method of claim 13, wherein the SOD2 polypeptide is avariant SOD2 polypeptide that comprises amino acid substitutions of atleast K53 and K89, compared to the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQID NO:1, wherein the variant SOD2 polypeptide exhibits enzymaticactivity that is at least 50% higher than the enzymatic activity of aSOD2 polypeptide comprising the amino acid sequence set forth in SEQ IDNO:1.
 16. The method of claim 13, wherein the assay is a cell-freeassay.